Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
13 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Volume 26(4); August 2010
Prev issue Next issue
Editorials
Survivin may be a Key Target for Oxaliplatin
Moo Jun Baek
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):239-239.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.239
  • 2,364 View
  • 30 Download
  • 1 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A role for ceramide glycosylation in resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer
    James P. Madigan, Robert W. Robey, Joanna E. Poprawski, Huakang Huang, Christopher J. Clarke, Michael M. Gottesman, Myles C. Cabot, Daniel W. Rosenberg
    Experimental Cell Research.2020; 388(2): 111860.     CrossRef
Cessation or dose reduction of Capecitabine due to Complications in Patients with Colon Cancer
Seung Kook Sohn
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):240-240.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.240
  • 2,356 View
  • 32 Download
PDF
Review
Right Colonic Diverticulitis
In Kyu Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):241-245.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.241
  • 4,333 View
  • 66 Download
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Although right colonic diverticultis (RCD) has been reported to be a rare disease in Western countries, RCD is a common diagnosis, with an incidence per 2.9-17 case of appendicitis, in Korea. Many Western studies have reported that it is difficult to differentiate the presenting symptoms of RCD from those of appendicitis before surgery because the signs and symptoms are similar. However, performing a computed tomography scan after the application of the diagnostic criteria for RCD has increased the preoperative RCD diagnostic rate. Treatment strategies have been difficult to define for this condition due to its low preoperative diagnosis rate. However, recent reports have shown that conservative medical treatment of uncomplicated RCD can be recommended and that such treatment is effective due to the benign and self-limited natural history of RCD. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the controversies surrounding RCD management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Beyond the Norm: Acute Multifocal Diverticulitis
    Bianca Thakkar, Jasmine Tidwell, Minh Thu T. Nguyen, Gengsheng Yu, Neil Parikh
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2024; 11(9): e01505.     CrossRef
  • Isolated Cecal Diverticulitis in a Non-Asian Patient With Strong Family History of Colon Adenocarcinoma
    Reynold Henry, Benjamin Tam, Nicholas Serniak, Glenn Ault
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(4): 1054.     CrossRef
  • Right-sided acute diverticulitis in the West: experience at a university hospital in Argentina
    René M. Palacios Huatuco, Diana A. Pantoja Pachajoa, Julian E. Liaño, Héctor A. Picón Molina, Rafael Palencia, Alejandro M. Doniquian, Matías Parodi
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • Case Series of Right Colon Diverticulitis in the West: A Neglected Disease?
    Lucas Faraco Sobrado, Tarsila Gomes Caldas, Carolina Graciolli Facanali, Leonardo Bustamente-Lopez, Carlos Walter Sobrado
    Journal of Coloproctology.2022; 42(04): 302.     CrossRef
  • Seeking outpatient management of right-sided diverticulitis
    María Savoie-Hontoria, Rafael José Orti-Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel García Bello, Antonio Dámaso Pérez Álvarez, Manuel Ángel Barrera Gómez
    European Surgery.2021; 53(6): 305.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic diverticulectomy versus non-operative treatment for uncomplicated right colonic diverticulitis
    Le Huy Luu, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Vo Thi Hong Yen, Do Thi Thu Phuong, Bui Khac Vu, Nguyen Viet Thanh, Nguyen Thien Khanh, Nguyen Van Hai
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2019.     CrossRef
  • Diverticulitis aguda del ángulo hepático simulando un cuadro de colecistitis aguda
    M. Gonzalez-Urquijo, A. Baca-Arzaga, G. Lozano-Balderas
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México.2020; 85(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Acute diverticulitis of the hepatic flexure mimicking acute cholecystitis
    M. Gonzalez-Urquijo, A. Baca-Arzaga, G. Lozano-Balderas
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition).2020; 85(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Perforated cecal diverticulitis with CT diagnosis and medical management
    Caleb Tsetse, Shazia Rahat Chaudhry, Feraas Jabi, Jennifer Nicole Taylor
    Radiology Case Reports.2019; 14(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcome and management of right colonic diverticulitis in western countries: Multicentric Retrospective Study
    L. Courtot, V. Bridoux, Z. Lakkis, G. Piessen, G. Manceau, A. Mulliri, G. Meurette, A. Bouayed, A. Vénara, B. Blanc, N. Tabchouri, E. Salamé, M. Ouaïssi
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2019; 156(4): 296.     CrossRef
  • Résultats à long terme et prise en charge des diverticulites du colon droit dans les pays occidentaux : étude rétrospective multicentrique
    L. Courtot, V. Bridoux, Z. Lakkis, G. Piessen, G. Manceau, A. Mulliri, G. Meurette, A. Bouayed, A. Vénara, B. Blanc, N. Tabchouri, E. Salamé, M. Ouaïssi
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2019; 156(4): 322.     CrossRef
  • Novel swine model of colonic diverticulosis
    Xiaomei Guo, Bhavesh Patel, Ling Han, Hiba Al-Dulaimi, William G. Van Alstine, Jillian N. Noblet, Sean Chambers, Ghassan S Kassab
    American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology.2019; 317(1): G51.     CrossRef
  • Clinical differentiation of acute appendicitis and right colonic diverticulitis: A case-control study
    Yosuke Sasaki, Fumiya Komatsu, Naoyasu Kashima, Takahiro Sato, Ikutaka Takemoto, Sho Kijima, Tadashi Maeda, Takamasa Ishii, Taito Miyazaki, Yoshiko Honda, Nagato Shimada, Yoshihisa Urita
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(12): 1393.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Case of Acute Right-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis Presenting as Pancreatitis
    Maria de Lourdes Ladino Sturchler, Evan A. Rusoja, Arun Nagdev, Barry C. Simon
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2018; 54(4): e77.     CrossRef
  • An Atypical Case of Transverse Diverticulitis and the Changing Management of Diverticular Disease
    Andrew C. Ostosh, Adeeb Saleh, Kevin M. Boehm
    Spartan Medical Research Journal.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Right-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis: Clinical Features, Sonographic Appearances, and Management
    Tse-Cheng Chiu, Yi-Hong Chou, Chui-Mei Tiu, Hong-Jen Chiou, Hsin-Kai Wang, Yi-Chen Lai, Yi-You Chiou
    Journal of Medical Ultrasound.2017; 25(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Right-sided acute diverticulitis: A single Western center experience
    Francesco Monari, Maurizio Cervellera, Basilio Pirrera, Umberto D'Errico, Samuele Vaccari, Laura Alberici, Valeria Tonini
    International Journal of Surgery.2017; 44: 128.     CrossRef
  • Acute Bowel Computed Tomography
    Abdulmalik Dredar, Prem Thanaratnam, Kaiser Hussain, Seth Andrews, Edward Mtui, Tara Catanzano
    Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI.2017; 38(4): 399.     CrossRef
  • Reste-t-il des indications pour la chirurgie à froid ?
    B. Schiltz, C. Dumont, N. C. Buchs, Ph. Morel, F. Ris
    Côlon & Rectum.2017; 11(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon derecho: revisión de conjunto
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V Vanni, Eduardo M Targarona
    Cirugía Española.2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Right Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Review
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V. Vanni, Eduardo M. Targarona
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis
    Winson Jianhong Tan, Hock Soo Ong
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2015; 221(2): 635.     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography of Colonic and Appendiceal Emergencies
    Vincent M. Mellnick, Christine O. Menias
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2014; 49(2): 202.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Colon Diverticulitis
    Geom Seog Seo, Suck Chei Choi
    Korean Journal of Medicine.2013; 85(6): 563.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Change in Expression of Survivin Caused by Using Oxaliplatin in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells
Won Jun Sohn, Jung Won Lee, Dong-Guk Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):246-253.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.246
  • 3,157 View
  • 42 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum compound, and it has no nephrotoxicity and has reduced bone marrow toxicity. Cancer cells that are resistant to cisplatin are sensitive to oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is used widely for the treatment of colon cancers. Recently, oxaliplatin was reported to inhibit the expression of survivin, which protects cell apoptosis. However, there are no reports on the expressions of survivin variants and the changes in intracellular localization of survivin in cancer cells. We studied the expression of survivin caused by oxaliplatin in HCT116 colon cancer cells, and we observed the localization of survivin in the mitotic phase.

Methods

We treated the HCT116 colon cancer cells with 2.0 µM of oxaliplatin, and we studied the expressions of survivin protein, and survivin mRNA variants, as well as the changes in intracellular localization, by using the Western blot method, RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry, and flowcytometry.

Results

Oxaliplatin inhibits the expression of the survivin protein and survivin mRNA in HCT116 colon cancer cells. The expression of the survivin-2B variants, which have no antiapoptotic activity but control cell mitosis by localization on a microtubule, is reduced continuously 2 days after treatment with oxaliplatin. In immunocytochemistry, expression of survivin in the cytoplasm is reduced and especially is not expressed in microtubules and contractile rings.

Conclusion

One of the mechanisms of oxaliplatin is to inhibit the expression of and to change the localization of survivin. Based on these results, we suggest that changes in the expression of survivin variants and in their localization are two effects of oxaliplatin.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Combining bevacizumab and chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Translational results of the AXEBeam trial
    M Verstraete, A Debucquoy, J Dekervel, J van Pelt, C Verslype, E Devos, G Chiritescu, K Dumon, A D'Hoore, O Gevaert, X Sagaert, E Van Cutsem, K Haustermans
    British Journal of Cancer.2015; 112(8): 1314.     CrossRef
  • Antichemosensitizing effect of resveratrol in cotreatment with oxaliplatin in HCT116 colon cancer cell
    Dong-Guk Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 86(2): 68.     CrossRef
Effects of DCA on Cell Cycle Proteins in Colonocytes
Yun-Hyung Ha, Dong-Guk Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):254-259.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.254
  • 3,100 View
  • 42 Download
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Evidence that indicates bile acid is a promoter of colon cancer exists. Deoxycholic acid (DCA) modifies apoptosis or proliferation by affecting intracellular signaling and gene expression. However, because previous studies have been based on studies on colon cancer cell lines, the effect of DCA on normal colonocytes is unknown.

Methods

Normal colonocytes and Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with 20 µM and 250 µM of DCA, and the effect of different concentrations of DCA was measured based on the expression of cell-cycle-related proteins by using Western blots.

Results

The expressions of CDK2 and cyclin D1 for different concentrations of DCA in normal colonocytes and colon cancer cells were similar, but the expressions of cyclin E and A were significantly different. In HCT116 colon cancer cells, the expression of cyclin E increased regardless of the DCA concentration, but in normal colonocytes and Caco-2 cells, the expression of cyclin E was not changed or decreased. In HCT116 colon cancer cells, the expression of cyclin A was not changed or decreased regardless of the DCA concentration, but in normal colonocytes and Caco-2 cells, the expression of cyclin A was increased at a DCA concentration of 20 µM.

Conclusion

The effect of DCA on stimulating cell proliferation suggests that DNA synthesis is stimulated by an increased expression of cyclin E in colon cancer cells. Our results suggest that a low dose of DCA induces cellular proliferation through increased expression of cyclin A and that a high dose of DCA induces decreased expression of cyclin E and CDK2 in normal colonocytes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Implication of gut microbes and its metabolites in colorectal cancer
    Arun Kumar, Asgar Ali, Raj Kishore Kapardar, Ghulam Mehdi Dar, Nimisha, Apurva, Abhay Kumar Sharma, Renu Verma, Real Sumayya Abdul Sattar, Ejaj Ahmad, Bhawna Mahajan, Sundeep Singh Saluja
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(1): 441.     CrossRef
  • Dissecting the role of the gut microbiome and fecal microbiota transplantation in radio- and immunotherapy treatment of colorectal cancer
    Lena Van Dingenen, Charlotte Segers, Shari Wouters, Mohamed Mysara, Natalie Leys, Samir Kumar-Singh, Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar, Rob Van Houdt
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Methyltransferase like 3 promotes colorectal cancer proliferation by stabilizing CCNE1 mRNA in an m6A‐dependent manner
    Wei Zhu, Yan Si, Jun Xu, Yu Lin, Jing‐Zi Wang, Mengda Cao, Shanwen Sun, Qiang Ding, Lingjun Zhu, Ji‐Fu Wei
    Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine.2020; 24(6): 3521.     CrossRef
  • Microbiota in cancer development and treatment
    Muhammad Hassan Raza, Kamni Gul, Abida Arshad, Naveeda Riaz, Usman Waheed, Abdul Rauf, Fahad Aldakheel, Shatha Alduraywish, Maqbool Ur Rehman, Muhammad Abdullah, Muhammad Arshad
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2019; 145(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Secondary Bile Acids and Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon: A Focus on Colonic Microbiome, Cell Proliferation, Inflammation, and Cancer
    Huawei Zeng, Shahid Umar, Bret Rust, Darina Lazarova, Michael Bordonaro
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(5): 1214.     CrossRef
  • Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in promoting the development of colorectal cancer
    Shaomin Zou, Lekun Fang, Mong-Hong Lee
    Gastroenterology Report.2018; 6(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Oxidative stress: a key regulator of leiomyoma cell survival
    Nicole M. Fletcher, Mohammed S. Abusamaan, Ira Memaj, Mohammed G. Saed, Ayman Al-Hendy, Michael P. Diamond, Ghassan M. Saed
    Fertility and Sterility.2017; 107(6): 1387.     CrossRef
  • Deoxycholic acid inhibits the growth of BGC-823 gastric carcinoma cells via a p53-mediated pathway
    HAI-BO YANG, WEI SONG, MEI-DIE CHENG, HAI-FANG FAN, XU GU, YING QIAO, XIN LU, RUI-HE YU, LAN-YING CHEN
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2015; 11(4): 2749.     CrossRef
  • Differential Regulation of EGFR–MAPK Signaling by Deoxycholic Acid (DCA) and Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) in Colon Cancer
    Sara M. Centuori, Jesse D. Martinez
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2014; 59(10): 2367.     CrossRef
  • Bile acids in the colon, from healthy to cytotoxic molecules
    Juan I. Barrasa, Nieves Olmo, Ma Antonia Lizarbe, Javier Turnay
    Toxicology in Vitro.2013; 27(2): 964.     CrossRef
  • Sodium deoxycholate inhibits chick duodenal calcium absorption through oxidative stress and apoptosis
    María A. Rivoira, Ana M. Marchionatti, Viviana A. Centeno, Gabriela E. Díaz de Barboza, María E. Peralta López, Nori G. Tolosa de Talamoni
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology.2012; 162(4): 397.     CrossRef
Laparoscopic Appendectomy with a Single Incision in a Single Institute
Jin A Lee, Ki Young Sung, Jun Hyun Lee, Do Sang Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):260-264.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.260
  • 4,095 View
  • 29 Download
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The laparoscopic appendectomy has become popular for the treatment of acute appendicitis. A single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy offers better cosmesis. We present the results of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomies in our hospital as initial experience.

Methods

A single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 75 patients at The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary's hospital. The operating time, operation type, hospital stay, surgical morbidities, and body mass index were compared.

Results

This retrospective study revealed equal operation times in both the suppurative and the perforated appendicitis group. There was an increase in the hospital stay in the perforated appendicitis group. The postoperative complication rate was 4%, and the median operation time was 58.55 ± 31.79 minutes.

Conclusion

The single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was easy and safe procedure for treating acute appendicitis. There were no differences in degree of inflammation and body mass index.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Comparative Study Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Using Conventional Instruments and Glove-Port (SILACIG) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Appendicectomy (CMLA)
    Ahamed Muneef, Uday Kumbhar, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Oseen Shaikh
    Cureus.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Perforated Appendicitis
    Byung Seo Choi, Geon Young Byun, Seong Bae Hwang, Sung Ryul Lee
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2016; 19(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SINGLE INCISION MULTIPORT LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
    Karunamoorthy Rajachidambaram, Dhinakaran Kaarthesan
    Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2016; 5(39): 2372.     CrossRef
  • The Twin Forceps: A New Instrument for SILS
    Antonia Rizzuto, Mario Donnici, Paola Nudo, Basilio Sinopoli, Rosario Sacco, Guido Danieli
    BioMed Research International.2015; 2015: 1.     CrossRef
  • Estudio comparativo prospectivo aleatorizado entre apendicectomía laparoscópica por puerto único y apendicectomía laparoscópica convencional
    Rafael Villalobos Mori, Jordi Escoll Rufino, Fernando Herrerías González, M.Carmen Mias Carballal, Alfredo Escartin Arias, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española.2014; 92(7): 472.     CrossRef
  • Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study Between Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Rafael Villalobos Mori, Jordi Escoll Rufino, Fernando Herrerías González, M. Carmen Mias Carballal, Alfredo Escartin Arias, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2014; 92(7): 472.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes of Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Preliminary Report of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Jung Rae Cho, Won Me Kang, Soo Min Ahn
    Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons.2014; 20(2): 48.     CrossRef
  • Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution
    F. Paul Buckley, Hannah Vassaur, Sharon Monsivais, Daniel Jupiter, Rob Watson, John Eckford
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(2): 626.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs
    Jun Gao, Ping Li, Qingguo Li, Dong Tang, Dao-Rong Wang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(10): 1319.     CrossRef
  • Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Won-Suk Lee, Sang Tae Choi, Jung Nam Lee, Keon Kug Kim, Yeon Ho Park, Woon Kee Lee, Jeong-Heum Baek, Tae-Hoon Lee
    Annals of Surgery.2013; 257(2): 214.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study Between Single-Incision and Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bong-Hyeon Kye, Junhyun Lee, Wook Kim, Dongjae Kim, Dosang Lee
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2013; 23(5): 431.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy at a Single Center
    Takahiro Watanabe, Hidetosi Wada, Masanori Sato, Yuichirou Miyaki, Junpei Tochikubo, Norihiko Shiiya
    Surgical Science.2013; 04(10): 426.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Minimally Invasive Single-Port/Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Haroon Rehman, Tim Mathews, Irfan Ahmed
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2012; 22(7): 641.     CrossRef
  • Single incision versus conventional multi-incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis
    Haroon Rehman, Ahsan M Rao, Irfan Ahmed
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2011;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single port laparoscopic appendectomy: are we pursuing real advantages?
    Nereo Vettoretto, Vincenzo Mandalà
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2011; 6(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Technical approaches to single port/incision laparoscopic appendicectomy: a literature review
    H Rehman, I Ahmed
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2011; 93(7): 508.     CrossRef
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection
Dong Hyun Choi, Jae Kwan Hwang, Yong Tak Ko, Han Jeong Jang, Hyeon Keun Shin, Young Chan Lee, Cheong Ho Lim, Seung Kyu Jeong, Hyung Kyu Yang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):265-273.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.265
  • 4,824 View
  • 55 Download
  • 48 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The anastomotic leakage rate after rectal resection has been reported to be approximately 2.5-21 percent, but most results were associated with open surgery. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and their relationship to the experience of the surgeon for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.

Methods

Between March 2003 and December 2008, 156 patients underwent a laparoscopic rectal resection without a diverting ileostomy. The patients' characteristics, the details of treatment, the intraoperative results, and the postoperative results were recorded prospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

Results

The majority of operations were performed for malignant disease (n = 150; 96.2%), and 96 patients (61.5%) were males. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 1 case (0.6%). The anastomotic leak rate was 10.3% (16/156), and there were no mortalities. In the univariate analysis, tumor location, anastomotic level, intraoperative events, and operation time were associated with increased anastomotic leakage rate. In the multivariate analysis, anastomotic level (odds ratio [OR], 6.855; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.271 to 36.964) and operation time (OR, 8.115; 95% CI, 1.982 to 33.222) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.

Conclusion

The important risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection without a diverting ileostomy were low anastomosis and long operation time. An additional procedure, such as diverting stoma, may reduce the anastomotic leakage if it is selectively applied in cases with these risk factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colonic Anastomotic Leakage: Current State of the Problem and Prospects for Early Diagnosis
    M. A. Chernykh, A. M. Belousov, K. G. Shostka
    Innovative Medicine of Kuban.2024; (3): 131.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Leak Rate and Prolonged Postoperative Paralytic Ileus in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colo-Rectal Cancer After Placement of No-Coil Endoanal Tube
    Michele Ammendola, Giorgio Ammerata, Francesco Filice, Rosalinda Filippo, Michele Ruggiero, Roberto Romano, Riccardo Memeo, Patrick Pessaux, Giuseppe Navarra, Severino Montemurro, Giuseppe Currò
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Potential short-term outcome advantage of low vs. high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: propensity score matching analysis
    Chia-Chen Hsu, Yu-Jen Hsu, Yih-Jong Chern, Bor-Kang Jong, Chun-Kai Liao, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Wen-Sy Tsai, Jeng-Fu You
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    Christos Tsalikidis, Athanasia Mitsala, Vasileios I. Mentonis, Konstantinos Romanidis, George Pappas-Gogos, Alexandra K. Tsaroucha, Michail Pitiakoudis
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(3): 3111.     CrossRef
  • Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery
    Valeria Tonini, Manuel Zanni
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(5): 745.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Transanal Drainage Tube for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Tatsunosuke Harada, Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yume Minagawa, Shingo Ito, Masataka Oneyama, Kazuhiro Narita
    Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(6): 420.     CrossRef
  • Preservation of the left colic artery in modified laparoscopic anterior rectal resections without auxiliary abdominal incisions for transanal specimen retrieval
    Yulin Liu, Peng Yu, Han Li, Lijian Xia, Xiangmin Li, Meijuan Zhang, Zhonghui Cui, Jingbo Chen
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Indocyanine Near-Infrared Fluorescence in Colorectal Surgery
    Francesco Maione, Michele Manigrasso, Alessia Chini, Sara Vertaldi, Pietro Anoldo, Anna D’Amore, Alessandra Marello, Carmen Sorrentino, Grazia Cantore, Rosa Maione, Nicola Gennarelli, Salvatore D’Angelo, Nicola D’Alesio, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servi
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study
    M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Intracorporeal reinforcement with barbed suture is associated with low anastomotic leakage rates after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Haiping Lin, Minhao Yu, Guangyao Ye, Shaolan Qin, Hongsheng Fang, Ran Jing, Tingyue Gong, Yang Luo, Ming Zhong
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Contributing to Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Surgery: Why, When, and Who Leaks?
    Shravani Sripathi, Mashal I Khan, Naomi Patel, Roja T Meda, Surya P Nuguru, Sriker Rachakonda
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Leak in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Massimiliano Fornasiero, Georgios Geropoulos, Konstantinos S. Kechagias, Kyriakos Psarras, Konstantinos Katsikas Triantafyllidis, Panagiotis Giannos, Georgios Koimtzis, Nikoletta A. Petrou, James Lucocq, Christos Kontovounisios, Dimitrios Giannis
    Cancers.2022; 14(21): 5464.     CrossRef
  • Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Yugang Jiang, Hongyuan Chen, Meng Kong, Dong Sun, Hongguang Sheng
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2022; 18(7): 1931.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary surgical outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: a propensity score matching study of 120 cases (with video)
    Mingguang Zhang, Zheng Liu, Peng Sun, Xiyue Hu, Haitao Zhou, Zheng Jiang, Jianqiang Tang, Qian Liu, Xishan Wang
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: Predictive Factors and Survival
    Swetha Prabhakaran, Sowmya Prabhakaran, Wei Mou Lim, Glen Guerra, Alexander G. Heriot, Joseph C. Kong
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2022; 95(5): 56.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Colectomy: Who Will Require Emergency Fecal Diversion?
    Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, Nicolas Tabchouri, Christine Denet, Théophile Guilbaud, Anaïs Laforest, Christophe Tresallet, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2021; 31(9): 1040.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rui Du, Jiajie Zhou, Guifan Tong, Yue Chang, Dongliang Li, Feng Wang, Xu Ding, Qi Zhang, Wei Wang, Liuhua Wang, Daorong Wang
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(7): 1514.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and its impacts on a long-term survival after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study
    Xinyu Qi, Maoxing Liu, Kai Xu, Pin Gao, Fei Tan, Zhendan Yao, Nan Zhang, Hong Yang, Chenghai Zhang, Jiadi Xing, Ming Cui, Xiangqian Su
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Nomogram for Prediction of Early Postoperative Complications of Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Jiawen Zhang, Linhua Jiang, Xinguo Zhu
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 7579.     CrossRef
  • A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of the Rectal Cancer without a Diverting Stoma
    Zhi-Jie Wang, Qian Liu
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Z. Balciscueta, N. Uribe, L. Caubet, M. López, I. Torrijo, J. Tabet, M. C. Martín
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(9): 919.     CrossRef
  • Computed tomography based cross-sectional anatomy of the pelvis predicts surgical outcome after rectal cancer surgery
    Gyoung Tae Noh, Soon Sup Chung, Kwang Ho Kim, Ryung-Ah Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 99(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on long-term survival in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery
    Marius Kryzauskas, Augustinas Bausys, Austeja Elzbieta Degutyte, Vilius Abeciunas, Eligijus Poskus, Rimantas Bausys, Audrius Dulskas, Kestutis Strupas, Tomas Poskus
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower rectal Cancer resection, including drain type: a retrospective single-center study
    Tetsushi Kinugasa, Sachiko Nagasu, Kenta Murotani, Tomoaki Mizobe, Takafumi Ochi, Taro Isobe, Fumihiko Fujita, Yoshito Akagi
    BMC Gastroenterology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction model for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
    Enesh Shiwakoti, Jianning Song, Jun Li, Shanshan Wu, Zhongtao Zhang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020; 48(9): 030006052095754.     CrossRef
  • Drainage smell and peritonitis are efficient indicators of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
    Enesh Shiwakoti, Jianning Song, Jun Li, Shanshan Wu, Zhongtao Zhang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020; 48(11): 030006052097076.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal with intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with shorter length of stay without increased direct cost
    Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Matthew Whealon, Colette S. Inaba, Christina Y. Koh, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Joseph C. Carmichael
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(2): 644.     CrossRef
  • Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Masahiro Fukada, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Takao Takahashi, Hisashi Imai, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Kazuya Yamaguchi, Kazuhiro Yoshida
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision
    Chi Zhou, Xian-rui Wu, Xuan-hui Liu, Yu-feng Chen, Jia Ke, Xiao-wen He, Xiao-sheng He, Tuo Hu, Yi-feng Zou, Xiao-bin Zheng, Hua-shan Liu, Jian-cong Hu, Xiao-jian Wu, Jian-ping Wang, Ping Lan
    Gastroenterology Report.2018; 6(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Antonio Sciuto, Giovanni Merola, Giovanni D De Palma, Maurizio Sodo, Felice Pirozzi, Umberto M Bracale, Umberto Bracale
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(21): 2247.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Factors for Small Intestinal and Colonic Anastomotic Leak: a Multivariate Analysis
    Ahmad Sakr, Sameh Hany Emile, Emad Abdallah, Waleed Thabet, Wael Khafagy
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2017; 79(6): 555.     CrossRef
  • Smoking and tumor obstruction are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection during rectal cancer treatment
    Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Soichiro Ishihara, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Hiroaki Nozawa, Toshiaki Watanabe
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2017; 1(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • De Prefectos a Mandatarios de la Nación. La violencia en la política peruana (1829-1836)
    Víctor Peralta Ruiz
    Revista de Indias.2016; 76(266): 173.     CrossRef
  • New technique of compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery – first results in 25 patients in Macedonia
    Svetozar Antovic, Aleksandar Mitevski, Aleksandar Karagozov, Biljana Kuzmanovska, Nikola Jankulovski
    PRILOZI.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis
    Kenji Kawada, Yoshiharu Sakai
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(25): 5718.     CrossRef
  • Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hui Qu, Yao Liu, Dong-song Bi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(12): 3608.     CrossRef
  • Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center
    S. AL Asari, M.S. Cho, N.K. Kim
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2015; 41(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    H.‐C. Pommergaard, B. Gessler, J. Burcharth, E. Angenete, E. Haglind, J. Rosenberg
    Colorectal Disease.2014; 16(9): 662.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Mortality of Anastomotic Dehiscence Requiring Reoperation After Rectal Carcinoma Resection
    Zhi-jie Cong, Liang-hao Hu, Jun-jie Xing, Zheng-qian Bian, Chuan-gang Fu, En-da Yu, Zhao-shen Li, Ming Zhong
    International Surgery.2014; 99(2): 112.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic leakage as an outcome measure for quality of colorectal cancer surgery
    H S Snijders, D Henneman, N L van Leersum, M ten Berge, M Fiocco, T M Karsten, K Havenga, T Wiggers, J W Dekker, R A E M Tollenaar, M W J M Wouters
    BMJ Quality & Safety.2013; 22(9): 759.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective gastrointestinal surgery
    D Roos, L M Dijksman, J G Tijssen, D J Gouma, M F Gerhards, H M Oudemans-van Straaten
    British Journal of Surgery.2013; 100(12): 1579.     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review of Anastomotic Leakage Rate According to an International Grading System Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Zhi-Jie Cong, Liang-Hao Hu, Zheng-Qian Bian, Guang-Yao Ye, Min-Hao Yu, Yun-He Gao, Zhao-Shen Li, En-Da Yu, Ming Zhong, Georgina L Hold
    PLoS ONE.2013; 8(9): e75519.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery
    R. N. Whistance, R. O. Forsythe, A. G. K. McNair, S. T. Brookes, K. N. L. Avery, A. M. Pullyblank, P. A. Sylvester, D. G. Jayne, J. E. Jones, J. Brown, M. G. Coleman, S. J. Dutton, R. Hackett, R. Huxtable, R. H. Kennedy, D. Morton, A. Oliver, A. Russell,
    Colorectal Disease.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients
    Hossein Masoomi, Ruihong Luo, Steven Mills, Joseph C. Carmichael, Anthony J. Senagore, Michael J. Stamos
    The American Journal of Surgery.2013; 205(4): 447.     CrossRef
  • Spontaneous Healing of a Rectovaginal Fistula Developing after Laparoscopic Segmental Bowel Resection for Intestinal Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis
    William Kondo, Reitan Ribeiro, Carlos Henrique Trippia, Monica Tessmann Zomer
    Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2013; 2013: 1.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Rodent Model Modifying Perioperative Temperature and Humidity during Bowel Surgery and Mimicking Laparoscopic Conditions
    Torben Glatz, Gabriel Seifert, Philipp A. Holzner, S. Chikhladze, Birte Kulemann, Olivia Sick, Jens Höppner, Ulrich Theodor Hopt, Goran Marjanovic
    Surgical Science.2012; 03(07): 353.     CrossRef
  • Randomized clinical trial of perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract versus placebo in elective gastrointestinal surgery
    D Roos, L M Dijksman, H M Oudemans-van Straaten, L T de Wit, D J Gouma, M F Gerhards
    British Journal of Surgery.2011; 98(10): 1365.     CrossRef
  • Ghost Ileostomy with or without abdominal parietal split
    Michele Cerroni, Roberto Cirocchi, Umberto Morelli, Stefano Trastulli, Jacopo Desiderio, Mario Mezzacapo, Chiara Listorti, Luigi Esperti, Diego Milani, Nicola Avenia, Nino Gullà, Giuseppe Noya, Carlo Boselli
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2011;[Epub]     CrossRef
Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Min Kyu Kang, Myung Se Kim, Jae Hwang Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):274-278.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.274
  • 3,069 View
  • 30 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is known to be a method that can reduce local recurrence in locally advanced colorectal cancer, it is not widely used. The aim of this study was to report our experience with IORT for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

From 1991 to 1994, nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received IORT. External beam radiotherapy was given postoperatively in five patients and preoperatively in three. Seven patients received chemotherapy. IORT was done with 6-MeV or 9-MeV electrons, and 12 Gy was irradiated at the tumor bed. The median follow-up period was 84 months (range, 15 to 208 months).

Results

The median age of patients was 51 years (range, 42 to 73 years). All patients had advanced clinical T-stage (cT3/4) cancer. The overall and the disease-free survival rates were 66.7% and 66.7% at 5 years, respectively. One patient developed a local recurrence near the anastomosis site, which was out of the IORT field. Four patients died before the last follow-up; three from distant metastasis and one from secondary primary cancer. Adverse effects related to IORT did not occur.

Conclusion

Although the number of patients was small in this study, IORT is thought to be safe and effective in reducing local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the role of IORT should be refined in the era of preoperative radio-chemotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced low rectal cancer
    Matej Skrovina, Renata Soumarova, Miloslav Duda, Roman Bezdek, Jiri Bartos, Adam Wendrinski, Petr Andel, Javed Parvez, Martin Straka, Lukas Adamcik
    Biomedical Papers.2014; 158(3): 447.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Resection with Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Local Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Preliminary Case Report
    Yimei Jiang, Xiaopin Ji, Shengguang Zhao, Ren Zhao, Yening Jin
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2013; 23(3): 267.     CrossRef
  • A review of the logistic role of l‐carnitine in the management of radiation toxicity and radiotherapy side effects
    Haseeb Ahmad Khan, Abdullah Saleh Alhomida
    Journal of Applied Toxicology.2011; 31(8): 707.     CrossRef
Clinical Significance of Tumor Regression Grade in Rectal Cancer with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Young Joo Park, Byung Ryul Oh, Sang Woo Lim, Jung Wook Huh, Jae Kyun Joo, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):279-286.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.279
  • 3,943 View
  • 31 Download
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy applied to the locally advanced rectal cancer reduces local recurrence and improves survival. We assessed tumor regression grade (TRG) and its influence on survival in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection.

Methods

We studied 108 patients that were seen at our hospital between August 2004 and December 2008. Patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by continous infusion during the first and fifth week, delivered with concurrent pelvic radiation of 50.4 Gy, followed by radical surgery at 6-8 weeks. The TRG was determined by the amount of fibrosis in the tumor embedding area and was divided into 5 grades based on the relative amount of fibrosis. We analyzed all preoperative clinicopathologic factors, postoperative pathologic stages, TRG and prognosis, retrospectively.

Results

Downstaging of rectal cancer through neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy occurred in 64 (59%) patients. The numbers of total regressions (TRG4), good regressions (TRG3), moderate regressions (TRG2), minor regressions (TRG1), and no regression (TRG0) were 19 (18%), 65 (60%), 17 (16%), 6 (5%), and 1 (1%) respectively. The TRG was inversely correlated with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.008, P = 0.032). The local recurrence rate declined as the tumor regression grade increased (P = 0.032). The 19 patients with TRG4 had a better three-year disease free survival than the 89 patients with TRG0-3 (P = 0.034). The 16 patients with pathologic complete remission (pCR) had a better three-year disease free survival than the 92 patients with non-pCR (P = 0.025).

Conclusion

Higher TRG after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer closely correlates with better survival and low local recurrence. The TRG is considered to be a significant prognostic factor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An investigation into tumor regression grade as a parameter for locally advanced rectal cancer and 5-year overall survival rate
    Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol, Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Worawit Wanichsuwan, Kanet Kanjanapradit, Teeranan Laohawiriyakamol
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(1): 59.     CrossRef
  • Rezultate preliminare ale markerilor ca predictori ai răspunsului tisular la radiochimioterapie în cancerul rectal
    Sânziana Ionescu, Petre Radu, Octavia Luciana Madge, Victor Strâmbu
    Oncolog-Hematolog.ro.2022; 1(58): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implication of Perineural and Lymphovascular Invasion in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(11): 1325.     CrossRef
  • Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy
    Praveen S. Kammar, Niharika R. Garach, Sivasanker Masillamany, Ashwin de’Souza, Vikas Ostwal, Avanish P. Saklani
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1215.     CrossRef
  • Overexpression of MLPH in Rectal Cancer Patients Correlates with a Poorer Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Reduced Patient Survival
    Wan-Shan Li, Chih-I Chen, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kuang-Wen Liu, Chia-Jen Tsai, Ching-Chieh Yang
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2132.     CrossRef
  • How to measure tumour response in rectal cancer? An explanation of discrepancies and suggestions for improvement
    Iris D. Nagtegaal, Rob Glynne-Jones
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2020; 84: 101964.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might provide survival benefit in patients with stage IIIb/IIIc locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective single‐institution study with propensity score‐matched comparative analysis
    Xi‐yu Sun, Song‐hua Cai, Lai Xu, Dan Luo, Hui‐zhong Qiu, Bin Wu, Guo‐le Lin, Jun‐yang Lu, Guan‐nan Zhang, Yi Xiao
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 16(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of tumour regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    J. C. Kong, G. R. Guerra, S. K. Warrier, A. Craig Lynch, M. Michael, S. Y. Ngan, W. Phillips, G. Ramsay, A. G. Heriot
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(7): 574.     CrossRef
  • UEG Week 2018 Poster Presentations

    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of tumour regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for a cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: an 8‐year retrospective single‐institutional study
    L. Xu, S. Cai, T. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Qiu, B. Wu, G. Lin, X. Sun, J. Lu, W. Zhou, Y. Xiao
    Colorectal Disease.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (MR-TRG) to assess pathological complete response following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Marco Rengo, Simona Picchia, Simona Marzi, Davide Bellini, Damiano Caruso, Mauro Caterino, Maria Ciolina, Domenico De Santis, Daniela Musio, Vincenzo Tombolini, Andrea Laghi
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(70): 114746.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic impact of pathologic response on clinical outcome after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Wook Hyeon Yoon, Hun Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyoon Joo, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2015; 88(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response
    Hun Jin Kim, Jeong Seon Jo, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2015; 22(6): 2075.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Prediction of Pathological Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Jung Wook Huh, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(6): 698.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Partial Tumor Regression After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Yen-Chien Lee, Chung-Cheng Hsieh, Jen-Pin Chuang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(9): 1093.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Role of p53 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in Patients after Curative Resection for Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer: Association with Colon Cancer Stem Cell Markers
    Jung Wook Huh, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2013; 216(6): 1063.     CrossRef
  • A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine for rectal cancer
    Lin Zhao, Chunmei Bai, Yajuan Shao, Mei Guan, Ning Jia, Yi Xiao, Huizhong Qiu, Fuquan Zhang, Ti Yang, Guangxi Zhong, Shuchang Chen
    Cancer Letters.2011; 310(2): 134.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of pathologic stage I lower rectal cancer with or without preoperative chemoradiotherapy: Are they comparable?
    Jung Wook Huh, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Surgery.2011; 150(5): 980.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcome after Cessation or Dose Reduction of Capecitabine in Patients with Colon Cancer
Jung-A Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Hyun-Sook Son, Hyoung Ran Kim, Hae Ran Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):287-292.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.287
  • 3,335 View
  • 38 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Oral capecitabine has been used as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer patients since the 1990s. Patient-initiated cessation or reduced use of capecitabine occurs widely for various reasons, yet the consequences of these actions are unclear. The present study sought to clarify treatment outcomes in such patients.

Methods

The study included 173 patients who had been diagnosed with stage II or III colon cancer according to the pathologic report after radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center from May 2005 to June 2007 and who had received capecitabine as adjuvant therapy. The patients were divided into groups according to whether the dose was reduced (I, dose maintenance; II, dose reduction) or stopped (A, cycle completion; B, cycle cessation). Recurrence and disease-free survival rates between the two groups each were analyzed.

Results

Of the 173 patients, 128 (74.6%) experienced complications, most frequently hand-foot syndrome (n = 114). Reduction (n = 35) or cessation (n = 18) of medication was most commonly due to complications. Concerning reduced dosage, both groups displayed no statistically significant differences in recurrence rate and 3-year disease-free survival rate. Concerning discontinued medication use, the cycle completion group showed an improved recurrence rate (P = 0.048) and 3-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.028).

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that maintaining compliance with capecitabine as an adjuvant treatment for colon cancer to preventing complications positively affects patient prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Value of Pharmacogenetics to Reduce Drug-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients
    Doreen Z. Mhandire, Andrew K. L. Goey
    Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2022; 26(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Global Cancer Burden and Natural Disasters: A Focus on Asia’s Vulnerability, Resilience Building, and Impact on Cancer Care
    Roselle De Guzman, Monica Malik
    Journal of Global Oncology.2019; (5): 1.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration and Survival Among Patients With Stage II and III Colon Cancer
    Devon J. Boyne, Colleen A. Cuthbert, Dylan E. O’Sullivan, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Robert J. Hilsden, Christine M. Friedenreich, Winson Y. Cheung, Darren R. Brenner
    JAMA Network Open.2019; 2(5): e194154.     CrossRef
  • 5-fluorouracil Toxicity Mechanism Determination in Human Keratinocytes: in vitro Study on HaCaT Cell Line
    Jan Hartinger, Pavel Veselý, Martin Šíma, Irena Netíková, Eva Matoušková, Luboš Petruželka
    Prague Medical Report.2017; 118(4): 128.     CrossRef
  • An exploratory study to identify risk factors for the development of capecitabine‐induced Palmar Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE)
    Annie Law, Sue Dyson, Denis Anthony
    Journal of Advanced Nursing.2015; 71(8): 1825.     CrossRef
Significance of Follow-up in Detection of Pulmonary Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer
Jae Won Shin, Sun Il Lee, Hong Young Moon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):293-297.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.293
  • 3,468 View
  • 26 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional chest radiography, carcinoembrionic antigen (CEA) level and abdominal computed tomography (CT) or chest CT for early detection of pulmonary metastasis after a curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 84 cases of pulmonary metastasis from a group of colorectal cancer patients who had a curative surgical resection from 2000 to 2006 at the Korea University Medical Center.

Results

Stage I tumors were detected in 4 patients, stage II tumors in 18, stage III tumors in 43 and stage IV tumors in 19. The detection rates for pulmonary metastasis were 28.5% by conventional chest radiography, 40.5% by increased CEA level and 28.5% by abdominal CT or chest CT. Among them, fourteen patients underwent a radical pneumonectomy. After detection of pulmonary metastasis, the survival outcome for the patients who underwent a resection of the lung was superior to the survival outcome of the patients who did not undergo a resection of the lung (43.7 months vs. 17.4 months, P = 0.001). For patients who underwent resections of the lung, pulmonary metastasis was detected by conventional chest radiography in 2 (14%) patients, by elevated CEA level in 6 (42%) patients, and by abdominal CT or chest CT in 6 (42%) patients.

Conclusion

Conventional chest radiography is no more useful in detecting early pulmonary metastasis after a curative colorectal surgery than a routine chest CT. Thus, we propose the use of routine chest CT for screening for lung metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A novel diagnostic model for differentiation of lung metastasis from primary lung cancer in patients with colorectal cancer
    Rui Guo, Shi Yan, Fei Wang, Hua Su, Qing Xie, Wei Zhao, Zhi Yang, Nan Li, Jiangyuan Yu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal resection and pulmonary resection by minithoracotomy: Report of four cases
    Tetsuo Tsukahara, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Taihei Oshiro, Shin Fujita, Hiroyuki Sakurai, Shun‐ichi Watanabe
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2014; 7(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Solitary Pulmonary Mass After Radical Treatment for Primary Cancers: Pulmonary Metastasis or Second Primary Lung Cancer?
    Jun Ge, Hong-Feng Gou, Ye Chen, Ke Cheng, Long-Hao Li, Hang Dong, Feng Gao, Feng Zhao, Hai-Tao Men, Qiu Li, Meng Qiu, Jing-Mei Su, Feng Xu, Feng Bi, Ji-Yan Liu
    Cancer Investigation.2013; 31(6): 397.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Impaction of a Foreign Body in the Rectum by Improper Use of a (Electronic) Massager: A Case Report
Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Gangmi Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):298-301.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.298
  • 3,384 View
  • 53 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A male, 67 years old, visited the emergency room because of a foreign body impacted in his rectum. While he was being treated for grade-II hemorrhoids conservatively, he heard that massage of the peri-anal area could be helpful for preventing hemorrhoids. Thus, while using an electronic massager after placing the head of the machine into a short round bar, the head became separated from the machine, and this was inserted into the anus and impacted. The patient had anal discomfort without abdominal pain. His vital signs were stable, and no abnormal physical findings were found for the abdomen. On digital rectal examination, the rim of the foreign body was palpated about 8 cm from the anal verge. Anal bleeding, abnormal discharge, or foul odor was not found. On a simple abdominal X-ray, a radio-opaque foreign body was observed in the pelvic cavity, and mild leukocytosis was noted on the laboratory test. To avoid injury to the anal sphincter, we tried to remove the foreign body under the spinal anesthesia. After anesthesia had been administered, the foreign body was palpated more distally at 5-6 cm from the anal verge by digital examination, and the foreign body was found to have a hole in its center. This was held using a Kelly clamp, and with digital guiding, was removed through the anus. After removal, an anoscopic examination was performed to determine if mucosal injury had occurred in the rectum or anal canal. The patient was discharged without complication after 24 hours of close observation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rectal perforation caused by a sharp pig backbone in a middle-aged patient with mild depression
    Hyeong Ju Sun, Jeonghun Lee, Dong Min Kim, Myeong-Su Chu, Kyoung Sun Park, Dong Jin Choi
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2015; 32(1): 31.     CrossRef
Laparoscopic Approach to a Case of Appendicular Schwannoma
Suk Won Suh, Joong Min Park, Yoo Shin Choi, Sung Jae Cha, In Taik Chang, Beom Gyu Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):302-306.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.302
  • 2,889 View
  • 33 Download
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Appendicular schwannoma is a rare tumor originating from Schwann's cells in the Auerbach plexus. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult because the clinical features are nonspecific, and it is mostly found accidentally via a radiologic image as a tumor, mimicking malignancy. We report a case of an appendicular schwannoma coexisting with an adenocarcinoma in the lung. A laparoscopic appendectomy was done with a clear resection margin, and the immunohistochemical staining showed positive S-100 protein, which confirmed the schwannoma. The patient also underwent a left upper lobectomy of the lung. The patient has been free of recurrence for the 6 months since the operation. The laparoscopic approach could be available for treatment of an appendicular schwannoma, thus avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Appendiceal schwannoma — report of a case and literature review
    Joseph P. Doyle, Ricky H. Bhogal, Monica Terlizzo, Vasileios K. Mavroeidis
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2023; 192(4): 1801.     CrossRef
  • Appendiceal schwannoma presenting as acute appendicitis
    Myeong Ja Jeong
    Radiology Case Reports.2023; 18(3): 775.     CrossRef
  • Perilesional Lymph Node Swelling Might be a Radiologic Clue for Appendiceal Schwannoma: A Case Report
    Kunihito Suzuki, Kazuhiro Saito, Takafumi Yamada, Elly Arizono, Hidehiro Kumita, Kenta Kasahara, Kenji Katsumata, Koichiro Tasaki, Jun Matsubayashi, Toshitaka Nagao
    Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews.2021; 17(10): 1266.     CrossRef
  • Appendiceal schwannoma: an incidental finding after Crohn's bowel resection
    Melanie D. Crispin
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Schwannoma of the appendix: A case report and review of the literature
    Ernest Cheng, Raymond Oliphant, Caroline Fung, Matthew Rickard, Anil Keshava
    Surgical Practice.2018; 22(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Appendicular schwannoma presenting as vague abdominal pain
    Abdullah Mohammed Alshamrani, Rami Abdulrahman Sairafi, Ali Mohammed Alzahrani, Mostafa Abdel-Raheem
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Resection of Appendiceal Schwannoma
    Toru Imagami, Satoru Takayama, Yohei Maeda, Ryohei Matsui, Masaki Sakamoto, Hisanori Kani
    Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Appendiceal Schwannoma
    Kojiro OMIYA, Satoaki KAMIYA, Satoru KAWAI, Kenji TAKAGI, Masanori UNO, Akihiro TOMIDA
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2017; 78(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Appendiceal Schwannoma
    Jae Won Choi, Seung Keun Park
    Intestinal Research.2013; 11(3): 223.     CrossRef
  • Schwannoma of ascending colon treated by laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Hun Jin Kim, Chang Hyung Kim, Sang Woo Lim, Jung Wook Huh, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP