Annals of Coloproctology

Skip Navigation: Skip to contents

SEARCH: Search

Advanced Search

mobile menu button

Page Path: HOME > Browse Articles

Won Cheol Park

7 Articles

Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery Using a Joystick-Guided Endoscope Holder (Soloassist II) or a Human Assistant: Jun Sung Kim, Won Cheol Park, Joo Hyun Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(4):181-186. Published online August 31, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.18

4,288 View
108 Download
9 Web of Science
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery in the Soloassist II-assisted (SA) group and in the human-assisted (HA) group.
Methods
A total of 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy and anterior resection performed by a single surgeon between January 2017 and May 2018 were recruited from the consecutively enrolled registry and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Of 76 patients, 43 underwent surgery with human assistance and 33 underwent surgery using the Soloassist II system. The clinicopathologic characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 groups. In both HA and SA groups, no statistical difference was observed between operation time (220.23 ± 47.83 minutes vs. 218.03 ± 38.22 minutes, P = 0.829), total number of harvested lymph nodes (20.42 ± 10.86 vs. 20.24 ± 8.21, P = 0.938), and other parameters of short-term outcomes (length of hospital stay, blood loss, open conversion, time to flatus, time to soft diet, and complication events). Subgroup analyses did not show statistical differences.
Conclusion
Soloassist II can reduce the participation of a human assistant during surgery and is not inferior to human assistance in laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery. Thus, it is a feasible instrument in laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer surgery that can provide positive short-term outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Solo surgery for low rectal cancer: trans‐circular anal dilator low rectal dissection associated with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision—A Video Vignette
Crafa Francesco, Vanella Serafino, Emanuele Caruso, Madoka Hamada, Nozomi Ueno
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 805. CrossRef
Application and advantages of a joystick-controlled robotic scope holder in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a comparative study
Suo-Hsien Wang, Tsai-Heng Hsieh, Wu-Po Chao, Ta-You Lo, Ting-shuo Huang, Yu-Hsien Chen
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(4): 1425. CrossRef
Usefulness of robotic camera control assisted duet laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer
Min Gyu Kim, Dong Baek Kang
Foregut Surgery.2024; 4(2): 57. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial
Takuya Kudo, Shingo Kanaji, Hitoshi Harada, Yasushi Ohmura, Ryuichiro Sawada, Naoki Urakawa, Hironobu Goto, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kimihiro Yamashita, Takeru Matsuda, Taro Oshikiri, Yoshihiro Kakeji
Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(5): 564. CrossRef
User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review
Hawa Hamza, Victor M. Baez, Abdulla Al-Ansari, Aaron T. Becker, Nikhil V. Navkar
Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(6): 4193. CrossRef
Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Guang-Ying Wan, Xiao-Yang Zhou, Hong-Xiang Duan, Zhen-Ya Zou, Man-Man Zhang, Jin-Bao Mao
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2023; 32(4): 153. CrossRef
Solo surgery laparoscopic intersphinteric resection (ISR) for Roullier type II low rectal cancer – Video correspondence
Crafa Francesco, Vanella Serafino, Alfonso Amendola, Madoka Hamada, Nozomi Ueno
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(12): 2472. CrossRef
Autonomous Endoscope Robot Positioning Using Instrument Segmentation With Virtual Reality Visualization
Kateryna Zinchenko, Kai-Tai Song
IEEE Access.2021; 9: 72614. CrossRef

Primary Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of the Colon Mesentery: Joo Hyun Lee, Dong Baek Kang, Won Cheol Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):152-154. Published online May 31, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.03.11

4,368 View
112 Download
10 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

An undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), also known as a malignant fibrous histiocytoma in the past, commonly involves the soft tissue of the extremities and the retroperitoneum. However, a primary UPS of the colon mesentery is very rare. A 69-year-old male patient visited our outpatient department for treatment of an enlarged, palpable mass in the right lower quadrant (RLQ). Computed tomography showed a 15-cm multilobulated, heterogeneous, enhanced mass in the RLQ, which we suspected originated from the colon. He underwent a right hemicolectomy, and the pathologic result was a colon mesenteric UPS. We report a rare case of a primary UPS of the colon mesentery and discuss the characteristics of this neoplasm in reference to the literature.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of the Descending Colon: An Infrequent Occurrence
Pir Abdul Ahad Aziz Qureshi, Shah Zeb, Thordur Tryggvason, Arnar Þórisson
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
High-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the colon with node positivity and literature review of current therapeutic targets and future perspectives
Gogo-Ogute E Ibodeng, Jaime Said, Marcus Kwon, Jennifer Ra, Christopher D Johnson, John J Richards
International Journal of Case Reports and Images.2024; 15(2): 111. CrossRef
Undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma at the anastomosis after ileocecal resection for colon cancer: A case report
Nao Kitasaki, Masatoshi Kochi, Marino Teshima, Masataka Nakagawa, Kazuhiro Toyota
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 125: 110643. CrossRef
Primary Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of the Rectum
Rayees Ahmad Dar, Rauf Ahmad Wani, Fazl Qadir Parray, Zubaida Rasool
Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(5): 1263. CrossRef
Undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the colon: a rare case report and literature review
Xu Han, Linxian Zhao, Yu Mu, Guoliang Liu, Guohong Zhao, Hongyu He, Shu Wang, Jiannan Li
BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
68Ga-FAPI Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of Colon Mesentery
Linqi Zhang, Zhidong Liu, Shuqin Jiang, Qiao He, Rusen Zhang
Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2022; 47(10): e651. CrossRef
Surgical management of primary undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the rectum: a case report and review of the literature
Keita Kodera, Masato Hoshino, Sumika Takahashi, Suguru Hidaka, Momoko Kogo, Ryosuke Hashizume, Tomonori Imakita, Mamoru Ishiyama, Masaichi Ogawa, Ken Eto
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical resection of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) with jejunal perforation, a suspected case of metastasis of lung cancer
Ryotaro Eto, Isamu Hoshino, Nobuhiro Takiguchi, Toru Tonooka, Hisashi Gunji, Naoki Kuwayama, Itaru Sonoda, Makiko Itami, Masayuki Otsuka, Yoshihiro Nabeya
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(5): 1386. CrossRef
Ultrasound and contrast enhanced CT imaging of a colon mesentery leiomyosarcoma
Peter Obel Otto, Martina K. Loft, Peter Grimm, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Malene Roland V. Pedersen
European Journal of Radiology Open.2021; 8: 100376. CrossRef

Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal: Won Park, Won Cheol Park, Keun Young Kim, Seok Youn Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):306-311. Published online December 20, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.07

8,321 View
161 Download
14 Web of Science
13 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Hartmann operation is widely recognized as a useful procedure, especially in emergencies involving the rectosigmoid colon. One of the surgeon’s foremost concerns after Hartmann operation is future colostomy reversal, as colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgical techniques continue to prove useful for an ever-increasing variety of indications. We analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversals at our center.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 170 patients who had undergone Hartmann operation between January 2010 and June 2017 at Wonkwang University Hospital. Among 68 Hartmann colostomy reversals, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of 3 groups of patients: 29 patients in the open colostomy reversal group (OG) who had undergone laparotomies for Hartmann reversals, 19 patients in the conversion group (CG) whose laparoscopic procedures had required conversion to a laparotomy, and 20 patients in the laparoscopy group (LG).
Results
The overall reversal rate for Hartmann colostomies was 40.5% during this time period. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among LG patients (10.15 ± 2.94 days) than among OG patients (16 ± 9.5 days). The overall complication rate among OG patients was higher than that among LG patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; P = 0.01). The most common complication was postoperative ileus (19.1%).
Conclusion
If no contraindications to laparoscopy exist, surgeons should favor a laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation over an open reversal.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study
Mu-Han Tsai, Ming-Jenn Chen, Khaa-Hoo Ong, Chih-Ying Lu, Chung-Han Ho, Hsuan-Yi Huang, Yu-Feng Tian, I-Ning Yang
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis
Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: A single‐center retrospective study in Japan
Aya Sato, Ken Imaizumi, Hiroyuki Kasajima, Keisuke Obuchi, Kentaro Sato, Daisuke Yamana, Yosuke Tsuruga, Minoru Umehara, Michihiro Kurushima, Kazuaki Nakanishi
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 137. CrossRef
A Case of Laparoscopic Hartmann's Procedure Followed by Laparoscopic Reversal for Perforated Diverticulitis
Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ryotaro Sakio, Nao Kakizawa, Rei Takahashi, Yuuri Hatsuzawa, Yasuaki Kimura, Erika Machida, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Toshiki Rikiyama
Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2022; 75(1): 36. CrossRef
Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis
D. Chavrier, A. Alves, B. Menahem
Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(4): 239. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients
Anwar Medellin Abueta, Nairo Javier Senejoa, Mauricio Pedraza Ciro, Lina Fory, Carlos Perez Rivera, Carlos Edmundo Martinez Jaramillo, Lina Maria Mateus Barbosa, Heinz Orlando Ibañez Varela, Javier A. Carrera, Rafael Garcia Duperly, Luis A Sanchez, Ivan D
Health Science Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: experiences from a developing country
Dung Anh Nguyen, Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Truc Thanh Thai, Hai Van Nguyen
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 297. CrossRef
Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yingjia Zhang, Chunxi Liu, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala, Choon Seng Chong
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2421. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study
Paolo Panaccio, Tommaso Grottola, Rossana Percario, Federico Selvaggi, Severino Cericola, Alfonso Lapergola, Maira Farrukh, Giuseppe Di Martino, Marco Ricciardiello, Pierluigi Di Sebastiano, Fabio Francesco Di Mola, Todd Pesavento
Surgery Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Effects of Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal on Short-term Operative Outcomes Among Vietnamese Patients
Viet Van Ung, Bang Cong Huynh, Vinh Chi Le, Dang Ngoc Tran, Trung Nguyen Vo, Tan Van Pham, Bac Hoang Nguyen
Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(02): 117. CrossRef
A comparative study between open versus laparoscopic Hartmann reversal
Hye Jung Cho, Woo Ram Kim, Jong Woo Kim
Medicine.2021; 100(47): e27976. CrossRef
Colorectal reconstructions following Hartmann’s procedure: challenges and solutions
A. N. Igolkin, V. V. Polovinkin
Innovative medicine of Kuban.2020; (4): 51. CrossRef
Emergency Hartmann’s Procedure and its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis
Diletta Cassini, Michelangelo Miccini, Farshad Manoochehri, Matteo Gregori, Gianandrea Baldazzi
Surgical Innovation.2019; 26(6): 770. CrossRef

Necrotizing Fasciitis Arising From an Enterocutaneous Fistula in a Case of an Appendiceal Mucocele: Keun Young Kim, Won Cheol Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):246-250. Published online December 31, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.246

3,824 View
39 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

An appendiceal mucocele (AM) is a rare tumorous condition of the appendix. Many patients with AM are admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain or discomfort, and many cases are found incidentally. Although the rate of complications in patients with AM is very low, if left untreated, a mucocele may rupture and produce a potentially fatal entity known as pseudomyxoma peritonei. In this paper, we report a case of an 80-year-old man with necrotizing fasciitis arising from an enterocutaneous fistula caused by AM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Enterocutaneous fistula resulting from the drainage of a contained appendiceal perforation secondary to a partially obstructing low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm
Ryan Cohen, Katie McKean, Stephanie Chetrit
BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(8): e244546. CrossRef
Atypical presentation of appendicitis
Oliver Beaumont, Robert Miller, Richard Guy
BMJ Case Reports.2016; : bcr2016217293. CrossRef

Postoperative Pain Relief Using Wound Infiltration With 0.5% Bupivacaine in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for an Appendectomy: So Ra Ahn, Dong Baek Kang, Cheol Lee, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):238-242. Published online December 31, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.238

5,760 View
58 Download
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Recently, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been popular for minimally invasive surgery and cosmetic improvement. However, some papers have reported that SILS for an appendectomy (SILS-A) has had the more postoperative complaints of pain. We investigated postoperative pain relief using wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine in SILS-A and compared the result with that for conventional SILS-A.

Methods

Between July 2010 and September 2012, 75 patients who underwent SILS-A were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: conventional SILS-A group (C-SILS-A) or wound infiltrated with 0.5% bupivacaine in SILS-A group (W-SILS-A). Forty-five patients were in the C-SILS-A, and 30 patients were in the W-SILS-A. Patients with perforated appendicitis were excluded. The clinical outcomes were compared between the groups by using the verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS).

Results

Clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups except for the pain score. The W-SILS-A group showed significantly lower numbers of additional pain killers and lower VNRS scores 1, 6, and 12 hours after surgery than the C-SILS-A group.

Conclusion

W-SILS-A is a technically simple and effective method of reducing early postoperative pain. It may be applicable in SILS-A for pain control system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in short-term acute care hospital
V.V. Bedin, V.Yu. Vengerov, O.V. Makarov, N.I. Koroleva, K.A. Loginov, V.L. Polianskii, F.G. Pilyus
Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2024; (12): 13. CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adult Acute Appendicitis
SHINTARO KOHAMA, KUNIHIKO NAGAKARI, MASAKAZU OHUCHI, KAZUHIRO TAKEHARA, KUMPEI HONJO, SHUN ISHIYAMA, KIICHI SUGIMOTO, SHINICHI OKA, JIRO YOSHIMOTO, MASAKI FUKUNAGA, YOICHI ISHIZAKI, KAZUHIRO SAKAMOTO
Juntendo Medical Journal.2024; 70(6): 436. CrossRef
Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review
Dusica M. Stamenkovic, Mihailo Bezmarevic, Suzana Bojic, Dragana Unic-Stojanovic, Dejan Stojkovic, Damjan Z. Slavkovic, Vladimir Bancevic, Nebojsa Maric, Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(20): 4659. CrossRef
Determination of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of unilateral hernia surgeries: A randomized controlled trial
Vijayalakshmi Sivapurapu, SriVengadesh Gopal, Ashley Solomon
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.2021; 37(3): 475. CrossRef
Effect of bupivacaine on postoperative pain and analgesics use after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: double-blind randomized study
Heon-Kyun Ha, Kyung-Goo Lee, Kang Kook Choi, Wan Sung Kim, Hyung Rae Cho
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(2): 96. CrossRef
Unilateral transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration
Emine Arık, T. Akkaya, S. Ozciftci, A. Alptekin, Ş. Balas
Der Anaesthesist.2020; 69(4): 270. CrossRef
Effect of Local Anesthesia on the Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Samir Čustovic, Haris Pandža, Samir Delibegovic
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2019; 29(1): 65. CrossRef
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015
Ramon R. Gorter, Hasan H. Eker, Marguerite A. W. Gorter-Stam, Gabor S. A. Abis, Amish Acharya, Marjolein Ankersmit, Stavros A. Antoniou, Simone Arolfo, Benjamin Babic, Luigi Boni, Marlieke Bruntink, Dieuwertje A. van Dam, Barbara Defoort, Charlotte L. Dei
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(11): 4668. CrossRef
Is transverse abdominis plane block effective following local anesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair?
Mun Gyu Kim, Soon Im Kim, Si Young Ok, Sang Ho Kim, Se-Jin Lee, Sun Young Park, Jae-Hwa Yoo, Ana Cho, Kyung Yul Hur, Myung Jin Kim
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2014; 67(6): 398. CrossRef
Preemptive Analgesia in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery
Eui Gon Youk
Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 221. CrossRef

Laparoscopic Treatment of Adult Sigmoidorectal Intussusception Caused by a Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Sigmoid Colon: A Case Report: Seok Youn Lee, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee, Dong Baek Kang, Young Kim, Ki Jung Yun; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(1):44-49. Published online February 28, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.44

4,879 View
55 Download
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Intussusception is a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in adult patients, but is common in children. In fact, it accounts for an estimated 1% of all cases of bowel obstruction in adults, although adult intussusception of the large intestine is rare. Sigmoidorectal intussusception, however, is a rare variety with few cases reported in the literature. A mucinous adenocarcinoma, a subtype of adenocarcinoma, is characterized by extracellular mucin production and accounts for between 5% and 15% of the neoplasms of the colon and rectum. Despite the general consensus supporting surgical resections for adult intussuceptions, controversy remains over whether intussuceptions should be reduced before resection. Most cases of colon intussusception should not be reduced before resection because they most likely represent a primary adenocarcinoma. However, prior reduction followed by a resection can be considered for the sigmoidorectal intussusception to avoid inadvertent low rectal cancer sugery. We experienced one case of sigmoidorectal intussusception caused by a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon in a 79-year-old woman. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a sigmoidorectal intussusception. After the end-to-end anastomosis-dilator-assisted reduction, the patient underwent a laparoscopic oncological anterior resection under the impression that a sigmoidorectal intussusception existed. We report a successful laparoscopic anterior resection in a patient with an intussusception caused by a sigmoid malignant tumor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Laparoscopic Reduction of Sigmoidorectal Intussusception by a Modified Hutchinson’s Maneuver
Haruna Onoyama, Takashi Nakamura, Yuka Ahiko, Naoki Sakuyama, Susumu Aikou, Dai Shida
Indian Journal of Surgery.2024; 86(2): 428. CrossRef
Strangulated appendiceal intussusception caused by isolated endometriosis
Seokyoun Lee, Junhee Lee, Keunyoung Kim
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2021; 8(3): 246. CrossRef
Unusual causes of large bowel obstruction
Nicholas G. Farkas, Ted Joseph P. Welman, Talisa Ross, Sarah Brown, Jason J. Smith, Nikhil Pawa
Current Problems in Surgery.2019; 56(2): 49. CrossRef

Application of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendectomies in Patients with Complicated Appendicitis: Kyung Chae Kang, Seok Youn Lee, Dong Baek Kang, Seung Ho Kim, Jung Taek Oh, Duk Hwa Choi, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):388-394. Published online December 31, 2010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.388

5,122 View
35 Download
29 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been studied for its being less invasive surgery and having cosmetic improvement. We investigated the application of SILS for an appendectomy (SILS-A) in cases of complicated appendicitis and compare it with a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (C-LA).

Methods

This study involved a total of 40 patients who underwent C-LA or SILS-A in patients with complicated appendicitis; 25 patients received a C-LA, and the other 15 patients received a SILS-A. The clinical outcomes and cosmetic results were compared between the groups.

Results

The SILS-A procedures were performed successfully in patients with complicated appendicitis, but 6 patients who underwent SILS-A needed an additional port for dissection and drainage. Clinical outcomes and postoperative complications were similar in both study groups. The SILS-A group showed significantly higher numbers of pain control than the C-LA group, and the one port SLLS-A group showed significantly better cosmetic result than the C-LA group.

Conclusion

SILS-A is technically feasible and safe in patients with complicated appendicitis. However, SILS-A has more postoperative pain than C-LA, and more active pain control should be considered for patients undergoing SILS-A.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical significance of appendicoliths in conservative treatment of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess: a single-center retrospective study
Lingqiang Min, Jing Lu, Hongyong He
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(11): 6440. CrossRef
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial
Osama H. Abd-Raboh, Amir F. Abdelhamid, Tarek M. Sehsah
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(1): 163. CrossRef
Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis
Franziska Köhler, Lena Reese, Carolin Kastner, Anne Hendricks, Sophie Müller, Johan F. Lock, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of single incision with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective analysis between similarly matched cohort with review of literature
Vipul Prakash Bothara, Mohammed Hamada Takrouney, Bhushan Jadhav, Mohamed Abdelkader Osman, Ibrahim Ali Ibrahim, Almoutaz Ahmed Eltayeb, Gursev Sandlas
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery.2021; 3(1): 47. CrossRef
Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performing by Emergency Operation: An Intervention Study in Vietnam
Duc Minh Pham, Vu Anh Pham, Mai Tuyet Vi, Linh Van Pham
Trends in Medical Sciences.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Comparative Study Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Using Conventional Instruments and Glove-Port (SILACIG) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Appendicectomy (CMLA)
Ahamed Muneef, Uday Kumbhar, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Oseen Shaikh
Cureus.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Is single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy suitable for complicated appendicitis? A comparative analysis with standard multiport laparoscopic appendectomy
Yu-Tso Liao, Peng-Sheng Lai, Yi-Zhong Hou, Chao-Yin Wu, Tzung-Hsin Chou, Jin-Tung Liang
Asian Journal of Surgery.2020; 43(1): 282. CrossRef
Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Beyond the Learning Curve: A Retrospective Comparison With Multi-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Sarah Assali, Sarah Eapen, Terry Carman, Sophia Horattas, Christopher R. Daigle, Charudutt Paranjape
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2018; 28(5): 291. CrossRef
Feasibility of Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Perforated Appendicitis
Byung Seo Choi, Geon Young Byun, Seong Bae Hwang, Sung Ryul Lee
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2016; 19(1): 19. CrossRef
Single-Port Laparoscopic Interval Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis With a Periappendiceal Abscess
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(3): 105. CrossRef
Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital
Byung Hee Kang, Kyung Chul Yoon, Sung Woo Jung, Gyeo Ra Lee, Hyung Soon Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2016; 91(2): 74. CrossRef
Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis
Jonas Raakow, Hans-Georg Liesaus, Peter Neuhaus, Roland Raakow
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(6): 1530. CrossRef
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lingling Zhao, Zhenqi Liao, Shaoguang Feng, Peng Wu, Guorong Chen
Pediatric Surgery International.2015; 31(4): 347. CrossRef
Efficacy of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy for appendicitis: a four-year experience at a single center
Noriaki Koizumi, Hiroki Kobayashi, Yuen Nakase, Tsuyoshi Takagi, Kanehisa Fukumoto
Surgery Today.2015; 45(10): 1245. CrossRef
Suprapubic single incision laparoscopic appendectomy
Yanan Wang, Wenjun Xiong, Xiaoliang Lan, Jianming Zhang, Tao Chen, Hao Liu, Guoxin Li
Journal of Surgical Research.2015; 193(2): 577. CrossRef
Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study Between Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Rafael Villalobos Mori, Jordi Escoll Rufino, Fernando Herrerías González, M. Carmen Mias Carballal, Alfredo Escartin Arias, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2014; 92(7): 472. CrossRef
Estudio comparativo prospectivo aleatorizado entre apendicectomía laparoscópica por puerto único y apendicectomía laparoscópica convencional
Rafael Villalobos Mori, Jordi Escoll Rufino, Fernando Herrerías González, M.Carmen Mias Carballal, Alfredo Escartin Arias, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
Cirugía Española.2014; 92(7): 472. CrossRef
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Thomas Resch, Robert Sucher, Alexander Perathoner, Elisabeth Laimer, Elisabeth Mohr, Johann Pratschke, Reinhard Mittermair
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2014; 24(6): e207. CrossRef
Interim report: A randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Stephen Kin Yong Chang, Yi Liang Wang, Liang Shen, Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer, Ahmad Bin Syed Buhari Shaik, Davide Lomanto
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2013; 6(1): 14. CrossRef
Comparative Study Between Single-Incision and Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Bong-Hyeon Kye, Junhyun Lee, Wook Kim, Dongjae Kim, Dosang Lee
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2013; 23(5): 431. CrossRef
A comparison of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: from the diagnosis to the hospital cost
Seung Min Baik, Kyung Sook Hong, Yong Il Kim
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2013; 85(2): 68. CrossRef
Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy
Adolfo Pisanu, Giulia Porceddu, Isabella Reccia, Alessandra Saba, Alessandro Uccheddu
Journal of Surgical Research.2013; 183(2): e49. CrossRef
Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jie Ding, Yu Xia, Zhong-min Zhang, Guo-qing Liao, Yang Pan, Sheng Liu, Yi Zhang, Zhongshu Yan
Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2013; 48(5): 1088. CrossRef
Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs
Jun Gao, Ping Li, Qingguo Li, Dong Tang, Dao-Rong Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(10): 1319. CrossRef
Single incision laparoscopic hepatectomy (SILH)
I. Pateras, J. Griniatsos, I. Karaiskos, N. Nikiteas, Ch. Tsigris
Hellenic Journal of Surgery.2012; 84(1): 60. CrossRef
Single-incision Appendectomy is Comparable to Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Richdeep S. Gill, Xinzhe Shi, David P. Al-Adra, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2012; 22(4): 319. CrossRef
Application of single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomy in children
Dong Baek Kang, Seung Hyun Lee, Seok Youn Lee, Jung Taek Oh, Dong Eun Park, Cheol Lee, Duk Hwa Choi, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2012; 82(2): 110. CrossRef
Single-site umbilical laparoscopic appendectomy
Daniel J. Ostlie
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery.2011; 20(4): 196. CrossRef
Single port laparoscopic appendectomy: are we pursuing real advantages?
Nereo Vettoretto, Vincenzo Mandalà
World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2011; 6(1): 25. CrossRef

TOP