Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Soeun Park 1 Article
Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery
Soeun Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(5):184-191.   Published online October 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.5.184
  • 5,080 View
  • 69 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.

Methods

From March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group.

Results

In the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS.

Conclusion

PAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    S. Gahunia, J. Wyatt, S. G. Powell, S. Mahdi, S. Ahmed, K. Altaf
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery
    Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, Himani Bhatt, Ibrahim A. Gomaa, Anne-Lise D. D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(4): 513.     CrossRef
  • The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
    Xu-Rui Liu, Bing-Lan Zhang, Dong Peng, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chun-Yi Wang
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(4): 1331.     CrossRef
  • Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer after low anterior resection: A case report
    Shoutarou Watanabe, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Nao Hiroe, Tomohiro Iwasawa, Michio Kosugi, Masayuki Shimizu, Masaru Ishida
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
    Xu-Rui Liu, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3471.     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review
    Won Beom Jung
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(2): 56.     CrossRef
  • Conversions related to adhesions in abdominal surgery. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach: A multicentre experience
    Marco Milone, Nicola de'Angelis, Nassiba Beghdadi, Francesco Brunetti, Michele Manigrasso, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servillo, Sara Vertaldi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center
    E. Lorenz, J. Arend, M. Franz, M. Rahimli, A. Perrakis, V. Negrini, A. A. Gumbs, R. S. Croner
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(3): 753.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries
    Anil Heroor, Aysha Khan, Kashish Jain, Akshay Patil, Hitesh Rajendra Singhavi
    Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2021; 4(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Safety and feasibility of repeat laparoscopic colorectal resection: a matched case–control study
    Alban Zarzavadjian le Bian, Laurent Genser, Christine Denet, Carlotta Ferretti, Anais Laforest, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Candice Tubbax, Philippe Wind, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2120.     CrossRef
  • Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study
    Ching-Wen Huang, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Cheng-Jen Ma, Tzu-Chieh Yin, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Po-Jung Chen, Yen-Cheng Chen, Ching-Chun Li, Yi-Chien Hsieh, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An individualized laparoscopic‐assisted approach in a patient with a sigmoid tumour and a giant incisional hernia – a video vignette
    C. Clancy, M. Flanagan, M. Bughio, M. G. O'Riordain
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(8): 972.     CrossRef
Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
© Korean Society of Coloproctology.
TOP