- Incisional hernia risk in intracorporeal anastomosis with Pfannenstiel incision versus extracorporeal anastomosis with midline incision for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a multicenter comparison
-
Francesco Saverio Lucido, Giusiana Nesta, Luigi Brusciano, Claudio Gambardella, Francesco Pizza, Giuseppe Scognamiglio, Gianmattia del Genio, Salvatore Tolone, Federico Maria Mongardini, Massimo Mongardini, Ludovico Docimo, Simona Parisi
-
Received September 29, 2024 Accepted January 20, 2025 Published online March 14, 2025
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00682.0097
-
-
 Abstract
- Purpose
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy can be performed via intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (ICA) or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (ECA). Prior studies have emphasized ICA’s advantages in hospital stay and postoperative pain. This multicenter study aimed to compare the 2-year incidence of incisional hernia between ICA (using a suprapubic Pfannenstiel incision) and ECA (using a pararectal incision) and assess perioperative outcomes.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy between 2019 and 2020, divided into 2 groups: ICA with a Pfannenstiel incision and ECA with a pararectal incision.
Results
The mean operative time was longer in the ICA group (190 minutes vs. 140 minutes, P=0.04). Despite requiring advanced surgical skills and prolonged operative time, ICA was associated with superior short-term outcomes and a significantly lower incisional hernia rate compared to ECA (1.2% vs. 14.7%, P=0.04) at 24-month follow-up.
Conclusion
ICA is linked to longer operative times, but shorter hospital stays, fewer wound complications, and reduced incisional hernia rates compared to ECA.
|
KSCP
APFCP
SIUCP-ETS
