Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Sei Hyeog Park 2 Articles
Association of Immune Status with Recurrent Anal Condylomata in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients
Ji Hyun Sung, Eun Jung Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Sei Hyeog Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):294-298.   Published online December 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.294
  • 3,579 View
  • 47 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

An anal condyloma is a proliferative disease of the genital epithelium caused by the human papillomavirus. This condition is most commonly seen in male homosexuals and is frequently recurrent. Some reports have suggested that immunosuppression is a risk factor for recurrence of a condyloma. Thus, we investigated the risk factors for a recurrent anal condyloma in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 85 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with and underwent surgery for an anal condyloma from January 2007 to December 2011. Outcomes were analyzed based clinical and immunologic data.

Results

Recurrent anal condylomata were found in 25 patients (29.4%). Ten cases (40.0%) were within postoperative 3 months. At postoperative 6 months, the CD4 lymphocyte count in the recurrent group was lower than it was in the nonrecurrent group (P = 0.023).

Conclusion

CD4-mediated immunosuppression is a risk factor for recurrent anal condylomata in HIV-positive patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness of physically ablative and pharmacological treatments for anal condyloma in HIV-infected men
    Sandra Vela, Sebastian Videla, Arelly Ornelas, Boris Revollo, Bonaventura Clotet, Guillem Sirera, Marta Piñol, Francesc García-Cuyás, Magdalena Grce
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(8): e0199033.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of fulguration combined with imiquimod cream on condyloma acuminatum, and the effect on immune functions and serums levels of IL-2 and IL-10
    Quan Chen, Ridong Yang, Aili Gao, Daoqing Zhong, Huilan Zhu
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2017; 14(1): 131.     CrossRef
  • Association of HIV Infection With Anal and Penile Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Amsterdam
    Camiel A.H. Welling, Sofie H. Mooij, Marianne A.B. van der Sande, Martijn S. van Rooijen, Wilma F. Vermeulen-Oost, Audrey J. King, Arne van Eeden, Daniëlle A.M. Heideman, Ineke G. Stolte, Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases.2015; 42(6): 297.     CrossRef
  • Condylomes anaux dégénérés. A propos de 13 cas
    R. Lalej, S. Nadir, W. Hliwa, F. Haddad, W. Badre, A. Bellabah, R. Alaoui
    Journal Africain d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie.2013; 7(4): 196.     CrossRef
A Clinical Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis
Sun Gu Lim, Eun Jung Ahn, Seong Yup Kim, Il Yong Chung, Jong-Min Park, Sei Hyeog Park, Kyoung Woo Choi
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(6):293-297.   Published online December 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.6.293
  • 5,137 View
  • 39 Download
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although laparoscopic appendectomies (LAs) are performed universally, a controversy still exists whether the LA is an appropriate surgical approach to complicated appendicitis (CA). We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomies for CA.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 60 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having CA from July 2009 to January 2011. Outcomes such as operative time, time to soft diet, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in operative time between the LA and the open appendectomy (OA) groups. Return to soft diet was faster in the LA group (2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.5 ± 1.5 days; P = 0.001). Length of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (4.4 ± 2.3 vs. 5.8 ± 2.9 days; P = 0.045). The overall complication rates showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. In cases involving a periappendiceal abscess, the LA had a significantly higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and postoperative ileus (PI; P = 0.028).

Conclusion

The LA showed good results in terms of the time to soft diet, the length of hospital stay, and surgical site infection (SSI) whereas the overall complication rates were similar for the two groups. However, the LA was associated with significantly higher incidence of IAA and PI for the cases with a periappendiceal abscess. Therefore, when using a LA, the surgeon must take great care to minimize the incidence of IAA and PI if a periappendiceal abscess is present.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors for developing intra-abdominal abscess following appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study
    B P Mao, G Collins, F E Ayeni, D J Vagg
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomies for complicated appendicitis
    Ahmed A. Sabry, Mahmoud Menesy, Mohamed Kassem, Mostafa R. Elkeleny
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(3): 736.     CrossRef
  • Intra and Postoperative Advantages of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis
    Andrej Nikolovski, Cemal Ulusoy
    PRILOZI.2022; 43(2): 59.     CrossRef
  • AAn Evaluation of the Choice of the Treatment for the Acute Appendicitis An Original Research
    Srikanth N. Jarupla, Ganesh Vadthya, Mushtaq A. Chowdhary, Heena D. Tiwari, Pritee R. Pandey, Afroz K. Syed, Akriti Mahajan
    Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.2022; 14(Suppl 1): S188.     CrossRef
  • Predictors for prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis in adults
    Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Carmen Payá-Llorente, Sandra Santarrufina-Martínez, Juan Carlos Sebastián-Tomás, Elías Martínez-López, Nicola de’Angelis
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(7): 3628.     CrossRef
  • A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study
    Tomoya Takami, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Yoshitake, Kotaro Hatano, Naoki Kataoka, Masafumi Tomita, Shinichiro Makimoto
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.2020; 46(4): 847.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial
    Ahmed Talha, Hany El-Haddad, Abd-Elhamid Ghazal, Gihan Shehata
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(2): 907.     CrossRef
  • The Bucharest ESTES consensus statement on peritonitis
    Bogdan Diaconescu, Selman Uranues, Abe Fingerhut, Mihaela Vartic, Mauro Zago, Hayato Kurihara, Rifat Latifi, Dorin Popa, Ari Leppäniemi, Jonathan Tilsed, Matei Bratu, Mircea Beuran
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.2020; 46(5): 1005.     CrossRef
  • Complications after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis
    Andrej Nikolovski, Shenol Tahir, Dragoslav Mladenovikj
    Lietuvos chirurgija.2020; 19(1-2): 34.     CrossRef
  • Irrigation Versus Suction in Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis
    Charalampos Siotos, Konstantinos Stergios, Vishnu Prasath, Stella M. Seal, Mark D. Duncan, Joseph V. Sakran, Mehran Habibi
    Journal of Surgical Research.2019; 235: 237.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis
    Gaik S. Quah, Guy D. Eslick, Michael R. Cox
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(7): 2072.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience
    Mitsugi Shimoda, Tsunehiko Maruyama, Kiyotaka Nishida, Kazuomi Suzuki, Tomoya Tago, Jiro Shimazaki, Shuji Suzuki
    Heliyon.2018; 4(5): e00635.     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature
    Christos Athanasiou, Sonia Lockwood, Georgios A. Markides
    World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(12): 3083.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis
    P. Horvath, J. Lange, R. Bachmann, F. Struller, A. Königsrainer, M. Zdichavsky
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(1): 199.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Hem-o-lok Polymer Clips: A Single-Center Experience
    Bahadır Öz, Ertan Emek, Muhammet Akyüz, Erdoğan Sözüer, Türkmen Arıkan, Alper Akcan, Hızır Akyıldız
    International Surgery.2017; 102(7-8): 334.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Modalities and Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives in the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections
    Charles Hoffmann, Matthew Zak, Lisa Avery, Jack Brown
    Antibiotics.2016; 5(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial
    Yoshiro Taguchi, Shunichiro Komatsu, Eiji Sakamoto, Shinji Norimizu, Yuji Shingu, Hiroshi Hasegawa
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(5): 1705.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open approach in the management of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis: A single center experience
    Felipe Quezada, Nicolas Quezada, Ricardo Mejia, Alejandro Brañes, Oslando Padilla, Nicolas Jarufe, Fernando Pimentel
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 13: 80.     CrossRef
  • Are There Specific Indications for Laparoscopic Appendectomy? A Review and Critical Appraisal of the Literature
    Dorin Popa, Marek Soltes, Selman Uranues, Abe Fingerhut
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2015; 25(11): 897.     CrossRef
  • Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess
    Jérémie Thereaux, Nicolas Veyrie, Nicola Corigliano, Stéphane Servajean, Sébastien Czernichow, Jean-Luc Bouillot
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(6): 1908.     CrossRef
  • Research and Science Today Supplement 1/2014
    Flavius Marcau, Elena Steluta Dinu, Roxana Elena Dobritoiu, Raul Constantin Tanase, Alina Buzaianu, Andreea-Emilia Duta, Ion Panait, Paul Duta, Magda Simona Scutaru, Nicolaie Manescu, Dragos Davitoiu, Laura Manda, Florin Chirculescu, Diana Epure, Margarit
    SSRN Electronic Journal.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Same-day Surgery for Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Appendicitis: Is this Safe?
    Wirt Cross, Gopal Chandru Kowdley
    The American Surgeon™.2014; 80(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis
    Jong Min Kim, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Won Joon Choi, Byung Ho Son
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2013; 16(4): 98.     CrossRef
  • A Study of Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Yo MIZUKAMI, Shuichi OTA, Atsushi HARADA, Masatoshi AKAGAMI, Takuya INOMOTO, Yukito ADACHI
    Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2013; 74(6): 1423.     CrossRef
Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
© Korean Society of Coloproctology.
TOP