Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Jin-Hee Paik 2 Articles
Clinical Significance of Preoperative Virtual Colonoscopy for Evaluation of the Proximal Colon in Patient With Obstructive Colorectal Cancer
Jae-Hyuk Heo, Chun-Geun Ryu, Eun-Joo Jung, Jin-Hee Paik, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(4):130-133.   Published online August 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.4.130
  • 4,166 View
  • 49 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Virtual colonoscopy is the most recently developed tool for detecting colorectal cancers and polyps, but its effectiveness is limited. In our study, we compared the result of preoperative virtual colonoscopy to result of preoperative and postoperative colonoscopy. We evaluated also the accuracy of preoperative virtual colonoscopy in patients who had obstructive colorectal cancer that did not allow passage of a colonoscope.

Methods

A total of 164 patients who had undergone preoperative virtual colonoscopy and curative surgery after the diagnosis of a colorectal adenocarcinoma between November 2008 and August 2013 were pooled. We compared the result of conventional colonoscopy with that of virtual colonoscopy in the nonobstructive group and the results of preoperative virtual colonoscopy with that of postoperative colonoscopy performed at 6 months after surgery in the obstructive group.

Results

Of the 164 patients, 108 were male and 56 were female patients. The mean age was 62.7 years. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of virtual colonoscopy for all patients were 31.0%, 67.2%, and 43.8%, respectively. In the nonobstructive group, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 36.6%, 66.2%, and 48.0%, respectively, whereas in the obstructive group, they were 2%, 72.4%, and 25.4%. Synchronous cancer was detected via virtual colonoscopy in 4 of the 164 patients.

Conclusion

Virtual colonoscopy may not be an effective method for the detection of proximal colon polyps, but it can be helpful in determining the therapeutic plan when its results are correlated with the results of other studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Cha
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 89.     CrossRef
  • Application of Virtual Endoscopy in Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia
    Wenbin Wei, Zhiyang Liu, Weijie Zhang, Yiwen Wang, Minjie Chen
    Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2021; 32(5): 1696.     CrossRef
  • Performance of CT Colonography in Diagnosis of Synchronous Colonic Lesions in Patients With Occlusive Colorectal Cancer
    Nicola Flor, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Carmelo Luigiano, Pietro Brambillasca, Anna Paola Savoldi, Clemente Verrusio, Daris Ferrari
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2020; 214(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous colorectal cancer using CT colonography vs. other means: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola Flor, Edoardo Zanchetta, Giovanni Di Leo, Miriam Mezzanzanica, Massimiliano Greco, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Francesco Sardanelli
    Abdominal Radiology.2018; 43(12): 3241.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between microsatellite instability and RAS gene mutation and stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer
    Wenbo Niu, Guiying Wang, Jun Feng, Zheng Li, Chenhui Li, Baoen Shan
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Detection of Polyps After Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Jin-Hee Paik, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):182-186.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.182
  • 5,401 View
  • 38 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Because colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery is important for detecting synchronous or metachronous colorectal neoplasms, we designed this study to investigate, by using postoperative colonoscopy, the miss rate for and the location of polyps remaining after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

In a prospectively-collected patient database, 264 patients were shown to have undergone a colorectal cancer resection between May 2012 and June 2013. Of these, 116 who had received a complete colonoscopy preoperatively and postoperatively were included in this study.

Results

Of these 116 patients, 68 were males and 48 were females; their mean age was 63 years. The mean time after surgery at which postoperative colonoscopy was performed was 7.1 months (range, 3-15 months). On postoperative colonoscopy, a total of 125 polyps were detected. Of these, there were no cancerous lesions; 46 (36.8%) were neoplastic polyps, and 79 (63.2%) were nonneoplastic polyps. Fifty-nine polyps (47.2%) and 15 polyps (12%) were located in the proximal and the distal parts of the anastomosis, respectively. The miss rates for the total numbers of polyps and of neoplastic polyps remaining after surgery were 37.4% and 24.2%, respectively. The incidence of neoplastic polyps increased during postoperative colonoscopy as it had during preoperative colonoscopy (r = 0.164, P = 0.048).

Conclusion

Colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection results in the detection of pathologic polyps in one-fourth of the cases. During postoperative colonoscopy, careful examination of the proximal colon is necessary. Patients in whom multiple neoplastic polyps had been detected during preoperative colonoscopy require careful and thorough follow-up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Bile acids as carcinogens in the colon and at other sites in the gastrointestinal system
    Harris Bernstein, Carol Bernstein
    Experimental Biology and Medicine.2023; 248(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Current status of water-assisted colonoscopy
    Jun-Quan Shen
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2020; 28(22): 1162.     CrossRef
  • Resting heart rate is an independent predictor of advanced colorectal adenoma recurrence
    Jihye Park, Jae Hyun Kim, Yehyun Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Ji Soo Park, Justin Y. Jeon, Tae Il Kim, John Green
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(3): e0193753.     CrossRef
  • A Study of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasms after Colorectal Cancer Resection Detected by Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Seiji Kimura, Masanori Tanaka, Shinsaku Fukuda
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2017; 70(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Kolon polipleri sayı ve büyüklüğü malignite göstergesi olabilir mi?
    Abdurahman ŞAHİN, Nurettin TUNÇ, Salih KILIÇ, Gökhan ARTAŞ, Ulvi DEMİREL, Orhan K. POYRAZOĞLU, İbrahim H. BAHÇECİOĞLU, Mehmet YALNIZ
    Endoskopi Gastrointestinal.2017; : 14.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Physical Activity and Body Fat Mass on Colorectal Polyp Recurrence in Patients with Previous Colorectal Cancer
    Jihye Park, Jae Hyun Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Ji Soo Park, Justin Y. Jeon, Tae Il Kim
    Cancer Prevention Research.2017; 10(8): 478.     CrossRef
  • Frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps in a tertiary hospital in Mumbai
    Anjali D. Amarapurkar, Prachi Nichat, Nitin Narawane, Deepak Amarapurkar
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 35(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • Surveillance Colonoscopy After a Resection of Colorectal Cancer
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(5): 170.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP