Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Hyoung-Chul Park 7 Articles
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis
Initial local excision for clinical T1 rectal cancer showed comparable overall survival despite high local recurrence rate: a propensity-matched analysis
Jong Hee Hyun, Mohamed K. Alhanafy, Hyoung-Chul Park, Su Min Park, Sung-Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae Hwan Oh, on behalf of the Seoul Colorectal Research Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):166-175.   Published online October 6, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00479.0068
  • 4,589 View
  • 168 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Local excision (LE) is an alternative initial treatment for clinical T1 rectal cancer, and has avoided potential morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LE compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) for clinical T1 rectal cancer.
Methods
Between January 2000 and December 2011, we retrospectively reviewed from multicenter data in patients with clinically suspected T1 rectal cancer treated with either LE or TME. Of 1,071 patients, 106 were treated with LE and 965 were treated with TME. The data were analyzed using propensity score matching, with each group comprising 91 patients.
Results
After propensity score matching, the median follow-up time was 60.8 months (range, 0.6–150.6 months). After adjustment for the necessary variables, patients who underwent LE showed a significantly higher local recurrence rate than did those who underwent TME; however, there were no differences in disease-free survival and overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 9.620; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.415–27.098; P<0.001) and angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.33–9.89; P=0.012) were independently associated with overall survival. However, LE was neither associated with overall survival nor disease-free survival.
Conclusion
LE for clinical T1 rectal cancer yielded a higher local recurrence rate than did TME. Nevertheless, LE provided comparable overall survival rate and can be proposed as an optional treatment in terms of organ-preserving strategies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database
    Jinghui Li, Liang Wen, Yongli Ma, Guosheng Zhang, Ping Wang, Chengzhi Huang, Xueqing Yao
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(3): 975.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Organ preservation for early rectal cancer using preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
    Jeonghee Han
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • The risk-benefit trade-off in local excision of early rectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Applications of propensity score matching: a case series of articles published in Annals of Coloproctology
    Hwa Jung Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 398.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease
Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study
Keunchul Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Jung Rae Cho, Minhyun Kim, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyoung-Chul Park, Rumi Shin, Seung Chul Heo, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park, Seoul Colorectal Research Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):403-408.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.23
  • 5,391 View
  • 165 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes from surgically treated patients for sigmoid volvulus.
Methods
Five tertiary centers participated in this retrospective study with data collected from October 2003 through September 2018, including demographic information, preoperative clinical data, and information on laparoscopic/open and elective/emergency procedures. Outcome measurements included operation time, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative morbidity.
Results
Among 74 patients, sigmoidectomy was the most common procedure (n = 46), followed by Hartmann’s procedure (n = 23), and subtotal colectomy (n = 5). Emergency surgery was performed in 35 cases (47.3%). Of the 35 emergency patients, 34 cases (97.1%) underwent open surgery, and a stoma was established for 26 patients (74.3%). Elective surgery was performed in 39 cases (52.7%), including 21 open procedures (53.8%), and 18 laparoscopic surgeries (46.2%). Median laparoscopic operation time was 180 minutes, while median open surgery time was 130 minutes (P < 0.001). Median postoperative hospitalization was 11 days for laparoscopy and 12 days for open surgery. There were 20 postoperative complications (27.0%), and all were resolved with conservative management. Emergency surgery cases had a higher complication rate than elective surgery cases (40.0% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.034).
Conclusion
Relative to elective surgery, emergency surgery had a higher rate of postoperative complications, open surgery, and stoma formation. As such, elective laparoscopic surgery after successful sigmoidoscopic decompression may be the optimal clinical option.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mesopexy instead of colectomy successfully treated an elderly patient with sigmoid volvulus, a case report
    Jin Qian, Shu-Qing Hua
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2025; 48(2): 1441.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes for sigmoid volvulus managed with and without early definitive surgery: 20‐year experience in a tertiary referral centre
    Shriranshini Satheakeerthy, Priscilla Leow, Benjamin Hall, Damien Ah Yen, Jesse Fischer
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(1-2): 169.     CrossRef
  • Patience is key: Association of surgical timing with clinical outcomes in elderly patients with sigmoid volvulus
    Suzanne C. Arnold, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Emanuele Lagazzi, Anne H. Hoekman, Vahe S. Panossian, Ikemsinachi C. Nzenwa, Charudutt N. Paranjape, George C. Velmahos, Haytham M.A. Kaafarani, John O. Hwabejire
    The American Journal of Surgery.2024; 232: 81.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology and age-related trends in surgical outcomes for sigmoid volvulus: a 17-year analysis
    Lukas Schabl, Stefan D. Holubar, Kamil Erozkan, Ali Alipouriani, Himani Sancheti, Scott R. Steele, Hermann Kessler
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Unveiling a Coalescing Catastrophe: Pre-pyloric Perforation Co-existing With Sigmoid Volvulus in a Middle-Aged Patient
    Mihir Patil, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Navigating Abdominal Volvulus: A Comprehensive Review of Management Strategies
    Simran Chauhan, Raju K Shinde, Yashraj Jain
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic redo surgery for sigmoid volvulus following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy
    Hideyuki Masui, Kenji Kawada, Susumu Inamoto, Toshiaki Wada, Yoshiharu Sakai, Kazutaka Obama
    Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sigmoid volvulus as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in the pediatric population: case series and literature review
    Isabel C. Brito Rojas, Mayra A. Hernández Peñuela, Vanessa Medina Gaviria, Martin La Rotta, John M. Escobar Echeverri
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous volvulus of the descending colon after resection of the sigmoid volvulus; a case report
    Molla Asnake Kebede, Sisay Mengistu Mohammed, Yilkal Teshome Numaro, Yohanes Yoseph Mesfine, Adugnaw Bogale Worku, Anteneh Messele Birhanu
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110212.     CrossRef
  • Left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis in the management of uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus: an observational study at Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal
    Eugene Gaudens Prosper Amaye Dieme, Birame Ndiaye, Magatte Faye, Samba Tiapato Faye, Moustapha Diop, Madawas Mboup, Ibrahima Sall, Oumar Fall, Alamasso Sow
    The Pan African Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation Before Nonelective Sigmoidectomy for Sigmoid Volvulus: Highly Beneficial but Vastly Underused
    Natalie Schudrowitz, C Patrick Shahan, Tovah Moss, John E Scarborough
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(4): 649.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Adverse Outcome and Its Predictors After Emergency Laparotomy Among Sigmoid Volvulus Patients: Retrospective Follow-Up Study
    Tilahun Deresse, Esubalew Tesfahun, Zenebe Gebreegziabher, Mandante Bogale, Dawit Alemayehu, Megbar Dessalegn, Tewodros Kifleyohans, George Eskandar
    Open Access Emergency Medicine.2023; Volume 15: 383.     CrossRef
  • Colonic pseudo-obstruction in a patient with dyssynergic defecation: A case report
    Yejun Jeong, Yongjae Kim, Wonhyun Kim, Seoyeon Park, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107524.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study”
    Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 73.     CrossRef
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 4,968 View
  • 118 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Reply on "Data on the Characteristics and the Survival of Korean Patients With Colorectal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry"
Hyoung-Chul Park, Bong Hwa Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(3):153-153.   Published online June 23, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.153
  • 3,355 View
  • 31 Download
PDF
Reply on "Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data"
Hyoung-Chul Park, Bong Hwa Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):56-56.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.56
  • 4,832 View
  • 21 Download
PDF
Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data
Hyoung-Chul Park, Kyu-Won Jung, Byung-Woo Kim, Aesun Shin, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Chang Sik Yu, Bong Hwa Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(5):182-185.   Published online October 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.5.182
  • 7,590 View
  • 40 Download
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

In Korea, anal cancer is rare disease entity with specific clinical characteristics. Therefore, no survival analysis with a sufficient patient population has been performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of Korean anal cancer, focusing on the survival according to tumor histologies, sex, and a specific age group, using the nationwide cancer registry.

Methods

Using the Korea Central Cancer Registry, we analyzed a total of 2,552 cases from 1993 to 2010. We assessed the 5-year relative survival by using tumor histology. In addition, survival differences of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) stage were analyzed for both sexes and for young-age cancer (younger than 40 years) and advanced-age cancer (older than 70 years).

Results

The 5-year relative survival among anal cancer patients increased from 38.9% for the period 1993-1995 to 65.6% for the period 2006-2010. The anal squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology and showed better survival than other types of cancer. Females demonstrated better survival than males in all SEER stages. The 5-year survivals for patients in whom anal cancer developed before the age of 40 and at or after the age of 40 were 62.4% and 51.6%, respectively. The 5-year survival for patients in whom cancer developed at or after the age of 70 was much worse than that for patients in whom the cancer had developed prior to that age.

Conclusion

Korean anal cancer has certain distinctive characteristics of survival according to tumor histology, sex, and age. Despite limitations on available data, this study used the nationwide database to provide important information on the survival of Korean patients with anal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Post-marketing surveillance study of the safety of the HPV-16/18 vaccine in Korea (2017–2021)
    Byung-Wook Eun, Enas Bahar, Stebin Xavier, Hyungwoo Kim, Dorota Borys
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term Oncologic Outcome and Its Relevant Factors in Anal Cancer in Korea: A Nationwide Data Analysis
    Hyuk Hur, Kyu-Won Jung, Byung-Woo Kim, Chang-Mo Oh, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Burden of Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease and potential impact of HPV vaccines in the Republic of Korea
    Young-Tak Kim, Beatriz Serrano, Jae-Kwan Lee, Hyunju Lee, Shin-Wha Lee, Crystal Freeman, Jin-Kyoung Oh, Laia Alemany, Francesc-Xavier Bosch, Laia Bruni
    Papillomavirus Research.2019; 7: 26.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal after chemoradiation therapy
    Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2016; 12(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Trends and Analysis of Cancer Incidence for Common Male and Female Cancers in the Population of Punjab Province of Pakistan during 1984 to 2014
    Khalid Masood, Andleeb Masood, Junaid Zafar, Abubaker Shahid, Mujahid Kamran, Sohail Murad, Misbah Masood, Zafar Alluddin, Masooma Riaz, Naseem Akhter, Munir Ahmad, Fayyaz Ahmad, Javaid Akhtar, Muhammad Naeem
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(13): 5297.     CrossRef
  • Reply on "Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data"
    Hyoung-Chul Park, Bong Hwa Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Patterns and Trends with Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates Reported by the China National Cancer Registry
    Peng-Lai Chen, Ting Zhao, Rui Feng, Jing Chai, Gui-Xian Tong, De-Bin Wang
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014; 15(15): 6327.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on "Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data"
    Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 54.     CrossRef
  • Anal Cancer Study Based on Korea Central Cancer Registry Data: One Step Forward in Clinical Research
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(5): 177.     CrossRef
Data on the Characteristics and the Survival of Korean Patients With Colorectal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry
Hyoung-Chul Park, Aesun Shin, Byung-Woo Kim, Kyu-Won Jung, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Chang Sik Yu, Bong Hwa Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(4):144-149.   Published online August 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.4.144
  • 5,210 View
  • 53 Download
  • 35 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korea have been increasing during the past decade. Therefore, it is important to understand the characteristics, including survival, of Korean CRC patients. The aim of this study was to use the nationwide cancer registry to evaluate the characteristics of Korean CRC, focusing on the survival, according to tumor location, sex, and specific age groups.

Methods

Using the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR), we analyzed a total of 226,352 CRC cases diagnosed from 1993 to 2010. The five-year relative survivals were compared for the proximal colon, the distal colon, and the rectum. Survival rates were compared between men and women and between patients of young age (less than 40 years old) and patients of advanced age (70 years old or older).

Results

The 5-year survival rates were improved in all subsites between 1993 and 2010. Distal colon cancer showed favorable survival compared to proximal colon or rectal cancer. Females demonstrated worse survival for local or regional cancers, and this difference was significant in for patients in their seventies. Young patients (<40 years old) showed better survival rates for overall and proximal colon cancer comparable to those for older patients (≥40 years old), but advanced age patients (≥70 years old) had worse survivals for all tumor subsites compared to their younger counterparts (<70 years old). These trends were similar in distant CRC.

Conclusion

Korean CRC has certain distinct characteristics of survival according to tumor location, sex, and age. Despite the limitations of available data, this study contributes to a better understanding of survival differences in Korean CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Relevance of Sex and Age as Non-Modifiable Risk Factors in Relation to Clinical-Pathological Parameters in Colorectal Cancer
    Robert Barna, Alis Dema, Aura Jurescu, Adrian Ovidiu Văduva, Dorela-Codruța Lăzureanu, Octavia Vița, Bianca Natarâș, Ioana Hurmuz, Adelina Vidac, Sorina Tăban, Sorin Dema
    Life.2025; 15(2): 156.     CrossRef
  • Gender-specific aspects of oncological diseases: focus on stomach cancer and colorectal cancer
    Ilgiz G. Gataullin, Rishat M. Dinov, Bulat I. Gataullin, Yana А. Erpert
    Science and Innovations in Medicine.2024; 9(2): 138.     CrossRef
  • Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Rectum as a Cause of Acute Obstructive Abdomen. Case Report and Literature Review
    Marcos Lenin Zambrano Avellán, Rolando Alberto Castro Cardenas, Yerlyn Narcisa Villacis Hidalgo , Stefhany Tatiana Guerrero Saltos, María Lorena Armijos Pazmiño, María José Peña Pibaque, Flavio Hernan Ante Guanotuña, Josseline Sofía Solano Zambrano, P
    Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología.2024; 4: 975.     CrossRef
  • Age-related differences in colon and rectal cancer survival by stage, histology, and tumour site: An analysis of United States SEER-18 data
    Sophie Pilleron, Diana R. Withrow, Brian D. Nicholson, Eva J.A. Morris
    Cancer Epidemiology.2023; 84: 102363.     CrossRef
  • Sex and gender perspectives in colorectal cancer
    I. Baraibar, J. Ros, N. Saoudi, F. Salvà, A. García, M.R. Castells, J. Tabernero, E. Élez
    ESMO Open.2023; 8(2): 101204.     CrossRef
  • Sex‐specific differences in colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Hyun Jin Joo, Hyun Seok Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Dae Bum Kim, Jae Hyun Kim, Jae Jun Park, Hyun Gun Kim, Il Hyun Baek, Jun Lee, Bun Kim
    Cancer Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer chemotherapy: can sex-specific disparities impact on drug toxicities?
    Silvia De Francia, Paola Berchialla, Tiziana Armando, Silvana Storto, Sarah Allegra, Veronica Sciannameo, Giulia Soave, Andrea Elio Sprio, Silvia Racca, Maria Rosaria Caiaffa, Libero Ciuffreda, Maria Valentina Mussa
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2022; 78(6): 1029.     CrossRef
  • Metformin, Statin Use, and Female Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan
    Shu-Hua Hsu, De-Kai Syu, Yu-Chiao Wang, Chih-Kuang Liu, Ming-Chih Chen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(15): 4469.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Characteristics and Outcome of Adolescent and Young Adult-Onset Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Kanjana Sukhokanjanachusak, Ananya Pongpaibul, Akarin Nimmannit, Charuwan Akewanlop, Krittiya Korphaisarn
    Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology.2021; 10(5): 573.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review
    Sophie Pilleron, Helen Gower, Maryska Janssen-Heijnen, Virginia Claire Signal, Jason K Gurney, Eva JA Morris, Ruth Cunningham, Diana Sarfati
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(3): e044239.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological patterns and survival outcomes of colorectal cancer among young adults in Malaysia: an institutional cohort study
    SW Wong, DY Ling, RQ Yeow, RW Chong, R Aziz, NA Aziz, KS Poh, AC Roslani
    Singapore Medical Journal.2021; 62(12): 636.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic approach for left-sided T4 colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure, compared to open surgery
    Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Jae Hwan Oh, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(9): 2843.     CrossRef
  • Cross-national analysis about the difference of histopathological management in Tis and T1 colorectal cancer between Japan and Korea
    Naohisa Yoshida, Yuji Naito, Yutaka Inada, Yoshito Itoh, Sang Pyo Lee, Jeong Hwan Kim, In-Kyung Sung, Hyung Seok Park, Hye Seung Han, Masayoshi Nakanishi, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Sun-Young Lee
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2019; 3(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in stage at diagnosis and survival among colorectal cancer patients: evidence from a Swiss population‐based study
    Anita Feller, Kurt Schmidlin, Andrea Bordoni, Christine Bouchardy, Jean‐Luc Bulliard, Bertrand Camey, Isabelle Konzelmann, Manuela Maspoli, Miriam Wanner, Marcel Zwahlen, Kerri M. Clough‐Gorr
    Cancer Medicine.2018; 7(4): 1498.     CrossRef
  • Early onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Worrisome trends and oncogenic features
    Giulia Martina Cavestro, Alessandro Mannucci, Raffaella Alessia Zuppardo, Milena Di Leo, Elena Stoffel, Giovanni Tonon
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2018; 50(6): 521.     CrossRef
  • Updates on Cancer Epidemiology in Korea, 2018
    Sun-Seog Kweon
    Chonnam Medical Journal.2018; 54(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and Survival of Korean Patients With Colorectal Cancer Based on Data From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data
    Hyuk Hur, Chang-Mo Oh, Young-Joo Won, Jae Hwan Oh, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(4): 212.     CrossRef
  • Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
    Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 286.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 627 patients with right‐ and left‐sided colon cancer in China: Differences in clinicopathology, recurrence, and survival
    Qiong Qin, Lin Yang, Yong‐Kun Sun, Jian‐Ming Ying, Yan Song, Wen Zhang, Jin‐Wan Wang, Ai‐Ping Zhou
    Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine.2017; 3(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of radiation-induced cystitis and vulvodynia via a ganglion impar block using a lateral approach under computed tomography guidance: a case report
    Jeong-Eun Lee, Kyung-Hwa Kwak, Seong Wook Hong, Hoon Jung, Seung-Yeon Chung, Jun-Mo Park
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 70(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Mitochondrial UQCRB as a new molecular prognostic biomarker of human colorectal cancer
    Hyun-Chul Kim, Junghwa Chang, Hannah S Lee, Ho Jeong Kwon
    Experimental & Molecular Medicine.2017; 49(11): e391.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected colorectal cancers that arose from sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas
    Ji Yeon Seo, Seung Ho Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Changhyun Lee, Ji Min Choi, Eun Hyo Jin, Sung Wook Hwang, Jong Pil Im, Sang Gyun Kim, Joo Sung Kim
    Intestinal Research.2016; 14(3): 270.     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcomes of Korean ulcerative colitis patients with and without colitis-associated cancer
    Yong Sik Yoon
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(12): 3547.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial
    Shapour Omidvari, Shadi Zohourinia, Mansour Ansari, Leila Ghahramani, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Hamid Nasrolahi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 123.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Features and Prognosis of Resectable Primary Colorectal Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma
    Ho-Su Lee, Jae Seung Soh, Seohyun Lee, Jung Ho Bae, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sun A Kim, Young Soo Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Dong-Hoon Yang
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 332.     CrossRef
  • Temporal Epidemiological Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in East Kazakhstan, 2004-2013
    Kuantkan Zhabagin, Nurbek Igissinov, Zukhra Manambayeva, Tasbolat Adylkhanov, Marat Sandybayev, Murat Nurgazin, Adilzhan Massadykov, Sayat Tanatarov, Daniyar Aldyngurov, Nailya Urazalina, Aizhan Abiltayeva, Ainoor Baissalbayeva, Almagul Zhabagina, Dinara
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(15): 6413.     CrossRef
  • The effect of high glucose levels on the hypermethylation of protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3C (PPP1R3C) gene in colorectal cancer
    SOO KYUNG LEE, JI WOOK MOON, YONG WOO LEE, JUNG OK LEE, SU JIN KIM, NAMI KIM, JIN KIM, HYEON SOO KIM, SUN-HWA PARK
    Journal of Genetics.2015; 94(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • Complete Resection of Colorectal Adenomas: What Are the Important Factors in Fellow Training?
    Ji Min Choi, Changhyun Lee, Jeong Hwan Park, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Sung Wook Hwang, Jaeyoung Chun, Seong-Joon Koh, Jong Pil Im, Ji Won Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2015; 60(6): 1579.     CrossRef
  • Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk
    Sung-Eun Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(17): 5167.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy Quality is the Answer for the Emerging Issue of Interval Cancer
    Jae Myung Cha
    Intestinal Research.2014; 12(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • Gender-specific Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiologic Difference and Role of Estrogen
    Hee Man Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 63(4): 201.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of venous thromboembolism following major surgery in Korea: from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database
    H.‐Y. Yhim, M.‐J. Jang, S.‐M. Bang, K.H. Kim, Y.‐K. Kim, S.‐H. Nam, S.H. Bae, S.‐H. Kim, Y.‐C. Mun, I. Kim, C.W. Jung, D. Oh
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.2014; 12(7): 1035.     CrossRef
  • Reply on "Data on the Characteristics and the Survival of Korean Patients With Colorectal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry"
    Hyoung-Chul Park, Bong Hwa Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(3): 153.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on "Data on the Characteristics and the Survival of Korean Patients With Colorectal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry"
    Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(3): 151.     CrossRef
  • What Should Be Done to Increase Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer?
    Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 135.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP