Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Eun-Joo Jung 10 Articles
Clinical Significance of Preoperative Virtual Colonoscopy for Evaluation of the Proximal Colon in Patient With Obstructive Colorectal Cancer
Jae-Hyuk Heo, Chun-Geun Ryu, Eun-Joo Jung, Jin-Hee Paik, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(4):130-133.   Published online August 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.4.130
  • 3,945 View
  • 49 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Virtual colonoscopy is the most recently developed tool for detecting colorectal cancers and polyps, but its effectiveness is limited. In our study, we compared the result of preoperative virtual colonoscopy to result of preoperative and postoperative colonoscopy. We evaluated also the accuracy of preoperative virtual colonoscopy in patients who had obstructive colorectal cancer that did not allow passage of a colonoscope.

Methods

A total of 164 patients who had undergone preoperative virtual colonoscopy and curative surgery after the diagnosis of a colorectal adenocarcinoma between November 2008 and August 2013 were pooled. We compared the result of conventional colonoscopy with that of virtual colonoscopy in the nonobstructive group and the results of preoperative virtual colonoscopy with that of postoperative colonoscopy performed at 6 months after surgery in the obstructive group.

Results

Of the 164 patients, 108 were male and 56 were female patients. The mean age was 62.7 years. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of virtual colonoscopy for all patients were 31.0%, 67.2%, and 43.8%, respectively. In the nonobstructive group, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 36.6%, 66.2%, and 48.0%, respectively, whereas in the obstructive group, they were 2%, 72.4%, and 25.4%. Synchronous cancer was detected via virtual colonoscopy in 4 of the 164 patients.

Conclusion

Virtual colonoscopy may not be an effective method for the detection of proximal colon polyps, but it can be helpful in determining the therapeutic plan when its results are correlated with the results of other studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Cha
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 89.     CrossRef
  • Application of Virtual Endoscopy in Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia
    Wenbin Wei, Zhiyang Liu, Weijie Zhang, Yiwen Wang, Minjie Chen
    Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2021; 32(5): 1696.     CrossRef
  • Performance of CT Colonography in Diagnosis of Synchronous Colonic Lesions in Patients With Occlusive Colorectal Cancer
    Nicola Flor, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Carmelo Luigiano, Pietro Brambillasca, Anna Paola Savoldi, Clemente Verrusio, Daris Ferrari
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2020; 214(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous colorectal cancer using CT colonography vs. other means: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola Flor, Edoardo Zanchetta, Giovanni Di Leo, Miriam Mezzanzanica, Massimiliano Greco, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Francesco Sardanelli
    Abdominal Radiology.2018; 43(12): 3241.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between microsatellite instability and RAS gene mutation and stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer
    Wenbo Niu, Guiying Wang, Jun Feng, Zheng Li, Chenhui Li, Baoen Shan
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Detection of Polyps After Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Jin-Hee Paik, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):182-186.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.182
  • 5,170 View
  • 38 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Because colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery is important for detecting synchronous or metachronous colorectal neoplasms, we designed this study to investigate, by using postoperative colonoscopy, the miss rate for and the location of polyps remaining after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

In a prospectively-collected patient database, 264 patients were shown to have undergone a colorectal cancer resection between May 2012 and June 2013. Of these, 116 who had received a complete colonoscopy preoperatively and postoperatively were included in this study.

Results

Of these 116 patients, 68 were males and 48 were females; their mean age was 63 years. The mean time after surgery at which postoperative colonoscopy was performed was 7.1 months (range, 3-15 months). On postoperative colonoscopy, a total of 125 polyps were detected. Of these, there were no cancerous lesions; 46 (36.8%) were neoplastic polyps, and 79 (63.2%) were nonneoplastic polyps. Fifty-nine polyps (47.2%) and 15 polyps (12%) were located in the proximal and the distal parts of the anastomosis, respectively. The miss rates for the total numbers of polyps and of neoplastic polyps remaining after surgery were 37.4% and 24.2%, respectively. The incidence of neoplastic polyps increased during postoperative colonoscopy as it had during preoperative colonoscopy (r = 0.164, P = 0.048).

Conclusion

Colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection results in the detection of pathologic polyps in one-fourth of the cases. During postoperative colonoscopy, careful examination of the proximal colon is necessary. Patients in whom multiple neoplastic polyps had been detected during preoperative colonoscopy require careful and thorough follow-up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Bile acids as carcinogens in the colon and at other sites in the gastrointestinal system
    Harris Bernstein, Carol Bernstein
    Experimental Biology and Medicine.2023; 248(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Current status of water-assisted colonoscopy
    Jun-Quan Shen
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2020; 28(22): 1162.     CrossRef
  • Resting heart rate is an independent predictor of advanced colorectal adenoma recurrence
    Jihye Park, Jae Hyun Kim, Yehyun Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Ji Soo Park, Justin Y. Jeon, Tae Il Kim, John Green
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(3): e0193753.     CrossRef
  • A Study of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasms after Colorectal Cancer Resection Detected by Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Seiji Kimura, Masanori Tanaka, Shinsaku Fukuda
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2017; 70(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Kolon polipleri sayı ve büyüklüğü malignite göstergesi olabilir mi?
    Abdurahman ŞAHİN, Nurettin TUNÇ, Salih KILIÇ, Gökhan ARTAŞ, Ulvi DEMİREL, Orhan K. POYRAZOĞLU, İbrahim H. BAHÇECİOĞLU, Mehmet YALNIZ
    Endoskopi Gastrointestinal.2017; : 14.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Physical Activity and Body Fat Mass on Colorectal Polyp Recurrence in Patients with Previous Colorectal Cancer
    Jihye Park, Jae Hyun Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Ji Soo Park, Justin Y. Jeon, Tae Il Kim
    Cancer Prevention Research.2017; 10(8): 478.     CrossRef
  • Frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps in a tertiary hospital in Mumbai
    Anjali D. Amarapurkar, Prachi Nichat, Nitin Narawane, Deepak Amarapurkar
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 35(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • Surveillance Colonoscopy After a Resection of Colorectal Cancer
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(5): 170.     CrossRef
Reply on "What Is the Role of Surgeons When Implanting a Totally Implantable Venous Access Device to Prevent Immediate Complications?"
Eun-Joo Jung, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):165-166.   Published online August 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.165
  • 3,225 View
  • 23 Download
PDF
Insertion of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgeons
Hyeonjun An, Chun-Geun Ryu, Eun-Joo Jung, Hyun Jong Kang, Jin Hee Paik, Jung-Hyun Yang, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(2):63-67.   Published online April 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.63
  • 5,267 View
  • 48 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results for the insertion of totally implantable central venous access devices (TICVADs) by surgeons.

Methods

Total 397 patients, in whom TICVADs had been inserted for intravenous chemotherapy between September 2008 and June 2014, were pooled. This procedure was performed under local anesthesia in an operation room. The insertion site for the TICVAD was mainly in the right-side subclavian vein. In the case of breast cancer patients, the subclavian vein opposite the surgical site was used for insertion.

Results

The 397 patients included 73 males and 324 females. Primary malignant tumors were mainly colorectal and breast cancer. The mean operation time was 54 minutes (18-276 minutes). Operation-related complications occurred in 33 cases (8.3%). Early complications developed in 15 cases with catheter malposition and puncture failure. Late complications, which developed after 24 hours, included inflammation in 6 cases, skin necrosis in 6 cases, hematoma in 3 cases, port malfunction in 1 case, port migration in 1 case, and intractable pain at the port site in 1 case.

Conclusion

Insertion of a TICVAD under local anesthesia by a surgeon is a relatively safe procedure. Meticulous undermining of the skin and carefully managing the TICVAD could minimize complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Implantable catheter chambers: a 14-year descriptive study
    Anas Erragh, Salma Bellaftouh, Safia Chaabi, Yassine Hafiani, Afak Nsiri, Rachid Alharrar
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology.2025; 18(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Vascular access device type for systemic anti-cancer therapies in cancer patients: A scoping review
    C. Duggan, O. Hernon, R. Dunne, V. McInerney, S.R. Walsh, A. Lowery, M. McCarthy, P.J. Carr
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 196: 104277.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning risk prediction model for bloodstream infections related to totally implantable venous access ports in patients with cancer
    Fan Wang, Yanyi Zhu, Lijuan Wang, Caiying Huang, Ranran Mei, Li-e Deng, Xiulan Yang, Yan Xu, Lingling Zhang, Min Xu
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 11(8): 100546.     CrossRef
  • Catheter malposition analysis of totally implantable venous access port in breast cancer patients
    Wenbo Liu, Qingzheng Han, Lin Li, Jiangrui Chi, Xinwei Liu, Yuanting Gu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Portocath insertion technique: retrospective study & step-by-step surgical description without tunneling in a high-complexity service
    ANNA MARIA GARCIA CARDOSO, FERNANDA SANTOS WENGROVER, ALINE WÜRZIUS, MARINA PUERARI PIETA, RAFFAELA NASCIMENTO DE CARLI, CARLOS EDUARDO BASTIAN DA-CUNHA, RICARDO BREIGEIRON
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sağ Atriumdan Sağ Juguler Vene Yolculuk: Nadir Bir Port Kateter Komplikasyonu
    Orhan ÜREYEN, Hüseyin FENERCİOĞLU, Demet ALAY, İlhan DURSUN, Enver İLHAN
    Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi.2021; 54(1): 148.     CrossRef
  • Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal
    Adriana Toro, Elena Schembari, Emanuele Gaspare Fontana, Salomone Di Saverio, Isidoro Di Carlo
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(6): 1739.     CrossRef
  • An analysis of the outcomes of totally implantable access port implantation performed by surgical residents
    Se-Beom Jeon, Youngbae Jeon, Kyoung-Won Han, Yong-Soon Chun, Jeong-Heum Baek
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 17(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Totally implantable venous access devices
    Swapnil Patel, Preeti Vijayakumaran
    Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment.2021; 4(3): 536.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Management of Vascular Access Ports in Nonhuman Primates Used in Preclinical Efficacy and Tolerability Studies
    Lucas A. Mutch, Samuel T. Klinker, Jody J. Janecek, Melanie N. Niewinski, Rachael M. Z. Lee, Melanie L. Graham
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2020; 33(6): 493.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a questionnaire of knowledge and attitudes about the subcutaneous venous reservoir in nursing
    Roberto Raña-Rocha, Ignacio López-de-Ullibarri, María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández, Carmen Coronado Carvajal
    Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Care Outcomes Between Two Methods of Drug Injection Through Ports and Peripheral Veins in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Seied Hashem Mosavi, Nasrin Elahi, Marziyeh Asadizaker, Ahmad Ahmadzadeh Deilami
    Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach in inserting totally implantable central venous access for cancer therapy: A comparative retrospective study
    Amine Souadka, Hajar Essangri, Imad Boualaoui, Abdelilah Ghannam, Amine Benkabbou, Laila Amrani, Raouf Mohsine, Mohammed Anass Majbar, Robert Jeenchen Chen
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0242727.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound‐guided totally implantable venous access device through the right innominate vein in older patients is safe and reliable
    Xingwei Sun, Yu Zhang, Chuanlai Yang, Yubin Zhou, Xuming Bai, Weiwei Zheng, Yong Jin
    Geriatrics & Gerontology International.2019; 19(3): 218.     CrossRef
  • An unusual catheter malposition following totally implantable venous access port insertion: The catheter tip located into the right axillary vein
    Ahmet Yüksel, Yusuf Velioğlu, Mustafa Enes Demirel, Erhan Renan Uçaroğlu
    Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Percutaneous Puncture in Insertion of Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices in Pediatric Patients
    Jung Sik Choi, Keun-Myoung Park, Sungteak Jung, Kee Chun Hong, Yong Sun Jeon, Soon Gu Cho, Yun-Mee Choe
    Vascular Specialist International.2017; 33(3): 108.     CrossRef
  • Reply on "What Is the Role of Surgeons When Implanting a Totally Implantable Venous Access Device to Prevent Immediate Complications?"
    Eun-Joo Jung, Dae-Yong Hwang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 165.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on "Insertion of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgeons" - What Is the Role of Surgeons When Implanting a Totally Implantable Venous Access Device to Prevent Immediate Complications?
    Adriana Toro, Gaetano Bertino, Annalisa Ardiri, Isidoro Di Carlo
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 163.     CrossRef
Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
Ui Sup Shin, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon, Sun Hoo Park, Sun Hee Jee, Eun-Joo Jung, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):28-34.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.28
  • 4,978 View
  • 43 Download
  • 33 Web of Science
  • 25 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of and the prognosis for colorectal cancers (CRCs) with microsatellite instabilities (MSIs).

Methods

Between 2006 and 2009, genotyping was performed on 245 patients with stage II/III CRCs to establish the MSI status. The clinicopathologic differences and the prognostic value of MSI were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 7-68 months).

Results

Of the total 245 patients, 20 (8.2%) had MSI-high (H) and 225 (91.8%) had MSI-low (L) or stable (S) CRCs. Adjuvant chemotherapies were performed on 101 stage II (87.8%) and 107 stage III patients (82.3%). Patients with MSI-H CRCs more frequently had a family history of colon cancer (10% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.003), more frequently had a cancer located at the proximal colon (90.0% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001), and more often showed a mucinous phenotype or poor differentiation (35.0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.001). Despite less frequent lymph node metastasis (25% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (26.3 ± 13.1 vs. 20.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.04) in the MSI-H group. The overall survival and the disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ with respect to MSI status. However, in the stage II subgroup, the DFS for patients with MSI-H CRCs was significantly worse (72.2% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.03). The multivariate analysis performed on this subgroup revealed that MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046).

Conclusion

MSI-H CRCs had distinct clinicopathologic features, and MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor in stage II CRCs. Considering the majority of stage II patients were administrated adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for treating MSI CRCs might be different from that for treating MSI-L/S tumors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic significance of negative lymph node count in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer
    Xuan Dai, Zhujiang Dai, Jihong Fu, Zhonglin Liang, Peng Du, Tingyu Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncological characteristics, treatments and prognostic outcomes in MMR-deficient colorectal cancer
    Wen-Xuan Fan, Fei Su, Yan Zhang, Xiao-Ling Zhang, Yun-Yi Du, Yang-Jun Gao, Wei-Ling Li, Wen-Qing Hu, Jun Zhao
    Biomarker Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the value of multiple preprocessors and classifiers in constructing models for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer
    Yi Ma, Zhihao Shi, Ying Wei, Feng Shi, Guochu Qin, Zhengyang Zhou
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a Swedish multi-center study
    Petri Rantanen, Anne Keränen, Shabane Barot, Sam Ghazi, Annelie Liljegren, Caroline Nordenvall, Annika Lindblom, Ulrik Lindforss
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiomics features based on internal and marginal areas of the tumor for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer
    Yi Ma, Changsong Lin, Song Liu, Ying Wei, Changfeng Ji, Feng Shi, Fan Lin, Zhengyang Zhou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anatomical Distribution of Colon Cancer: A Retrospective 10-Year Study to Evaluate Rightward Shift in Two Referral Hospitals in Iran
    Ahmad R Mafi, Shima Azimi Oliaei, Ramin Heshmat, Hossein Yahyazadeh, Ali G Motlagh
    International Journal of Cancer Management.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status on microsatellite instability, prognosis and adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: A nationwide survey of medical oncologists, colorectal surgeons and gastrointestinal pathologists
    James W. T. Toh, Hema Mahajan, Pierre Chapuis, Kevin Spring
    Cancer Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis
    James W. T. Toh, Kevin Phan, Faizur Reza, Pierre Chapuis, Kevin J. Spring
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(8): 1573.     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Model to Preoperatively Predict Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study
    Zhi Li, Qi Zhong, Liang Zhang, Minhong Wang, Wenbo Xiao, Feng Cui, Fang Yu, Chencui Huang, Zhan Feng
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colon cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency are more likely to present as acute surgical cases
    Ioannis Gkekas, Jan Novotny, Tuomas Kaprio, Ines Beilmann-Lehtonen, Pavel Fabian, Sofia Edin, Karin Strigård, Tomas Svoboda, Jaana Hagström, Lucie Barsova, Tomas Jirasek, Caj Haglund, Richard Palmqvist, Ulf Gunnarsson
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 157: 1.     CrossRef
  • Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer
    Kabytto Chen, Geoffrey Collins, Henry Wang, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 5356.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive role of DNA mismatch repair status in stage II‐III colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Zhujun Deng, Yun Qin, Jing Wang, Gang Wang, Xiaoqiang Lang, Juan Jiang, Kang Xie, Wengeng Zhang, Heng Xu, Yang Shu, Yan Zhang
    Clinical Genetics.2020; 97(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Implication of Microsatellite Instability in Chinese Cohort of Human Cancers


    Meiying Cui, Pan Li, Ying Mao, Lan Zhang, Peiyi Xia, Enjie Liu, Weiwei Wang, Jianying Zhang, Guozhong Jiang, Wencai Li
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 10287.     CrossRef
  • Small RNA expression from viruses, bacteria and human miRNAs in colon cancer tissue and its association with microsatellite instability and tumor location
    Robin Mjelle, Wenche Sjursen, Liv Thommesen, Pål Sætrom, Eva Hofsli
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Microsatellite Instability Status in an Asian Cohort of Sporadic Colorectal Cancers
    Winson Jianhong Tan, Julie Liana Hamzah, Sanchalika Acharyya, Fung Joon Foo, Kiat Hon Lim, Iain Bee Huat Tan, Choong Leong Tang, Min Hoe Chew
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2018; 49(3): 311.     CrossRef
  • Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system
    Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Dae-Won Lee, Yongjun Cha, Xianyu Wen, Tae Hun Lee, Nam-Yun Cho, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Sae Won Han, Hye Seung Lee, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    British Journal of Cancer.2017; 116(8): 1012.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of correlation between mutational status in key EGFR signaling genes and prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer
    Li Li, Bei-Bei Ni, Qing-Hua Zhong, Yan-Hui Liu, Ming-Hui Zhang, Ke-Ping Zhang, Dai-Ci Chen, Lei Wang
    Future Oncology.2017; 13(17): 1473.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncological outcomes of right-sided colon cancer versus left-sided colon cancer after curative resection
    Dae Ro Lim, Jung Kul Kuk, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin
    Medicine.2017; 96(42): e8241.     CrossRef
  • Downregulation of acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 is a metabolic hallmark of tumor progression and aggressiveness in colorectal carcinoma
    Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Hye Eun Park, Tae Hun Lee, Nam-Yun Cho, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    Modern Pathology.2017; 30(2): 267.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic relevance of microsatellite instability in pT3N0M0 colon cancer: a population-based study
    Francesco Iachetta, Federica Domati, Luca Reggiani-Bonetti, Valeria Barresi, Giulia Magnani, Luigi Marcheselli, Claudia Cirilli, Monica Pedroni
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2016; 11(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Clinical, histological, and molecular risk factors for cancer recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer
    Yann Touchefeu, Marie Provost-Dewitte, Thierry Lecomte, Alain Morel, Isabelle Valo, Jean-François Mosnier, Céline Bossard, Juliette Eugène, Emilie Duchalais, Jérôme Chetritt, Serge Guyetant, Stéphane Bézieau, Hélène Senellart, Morgane Caulet, Estelle Cauc
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2016; 28(12): 1394.     CrossRef
  • Microsatellite instability is associated with reduced disease specific survival in stage III colon cancer
    H.M. Mohan, E. Ryan, I. Balasubramanian, R. Kennelly, R. Geraghty, F. Sclafani, D. Fennelly, R. McDermott, E.J. Ryan, D. O'Donoghue, J.M.P. Hyland, S.T. Martin, P.R. O'Connell, D. Gibbons, Des Winter, K. Sheahan
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(11): 1680.     CrossRef
  • Different treatment strategies and molecular features between right-sided and left-sided colon cancers
    Hong Shen
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(21): 6470.     CrossRef
  • Is a Microsatellite Instability Still Useful for Tailored Treatment in Stage II and III Colon Cancer?
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 5.     CrossRef
Short-term Outcomes of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery vs. Open Surgery on Right Colon Cancer: A Case-Controlled Study
Jae-Hoon Sim, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Jin Hee Paik, Gangmi Kim, Su Ran Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):72-76.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.72
  • 8,554 View
  • 41 Download
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes by comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for right colon cancer.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (HAL-RHC group) and 33 patients who underwent a conventional open right hemicolectomy (open group) during the same period were enrolled in this study with a case-controlled design.

Results

The operation time was 217 minutes in the HAL-RHC group and 213 minutes in the open group (P = 0.389). The numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar between the two groups (31 in the HAL-RHC group and 36 in the open group, P = 0.737). Also, there were no significant difference in the incidence of immediate postoperative leukocytosis, the administration of additional pain killers, and the postoperative recovery parameters. First flatus was shown on postoperative days 3.5 in the HAL-RHC group and 3.4 in the open group (P = 0.486). Drinking water and soft diet were started on postoperative days 4.8 and 5.9, respectively, in the HAL-RHC group and similarly 4.6 and 5.6 in the open group (P = 0.402 and P = 0.551). The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the HAL-RHC group than in the open group (10.3 days vs. 13.5 days, P = 0.048). No significant difference in the complication rates was shown between the two groups, and no postoperative mortality was encountered in either group.

Conclusion

The patients with right colon cancer in the HAL-RHC group had similar pathologic and postoperative recovery parameters to those of the patients in the open group. The patients in the HAL-RHC group had shorter hospital stays than those in the open group. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer is feasible.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Wejih Dougaz, Meriem Mesbehi, Hichem Jerraya, Ramzi Nouira, Jim S. Khan, Chadli Dziri
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer—has the control group so far been chosen correctly?
    Jörg O. W. Pelz, Johanna Wagner, Sven Lichthardt, Johannes Baur, Caroline Kastner, Niels Matthes, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted Laparoscopy: Expensive but Considerable Step Between Laparoscopic and Open Colectomy
    Baris Gulcu, Ozgen Isik, Ersin Ozturk, Tuncay Yilmazlar
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2018; 28(4): 214.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer
    Xubing Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Chaoyang Gu, Tao Hu, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(33): e7794.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center
    Takayuki Tajima, Masaya Mukai, Daiki Yokoyama, Shigeo Higami, Shuji Uda, Sayuri Hasegawa, Eiji Nomura, Sotaro Sadahiro, Seiei Yasuda, Hiroyasu Makuuchi
    Oncology Letters.2017; 13(6): 4953.     CrossRef
  • Hand‐assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery with double‐glove technique
    Hernán Vaccarezza, Axel Sahovaler, Víctor Im, Gustavo Rossi, Carlos Vaccaro
    Surgical Practice.2016; 20(3): 124.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer—a matched pairs analysis
    M. Zimmermann, C. Benecke, C. Jung, M. Hoffmann, J. Nolde, E. Schlöricke, H. P. Bruch, T. Keck, T. Laubert
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(7): 1291.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study on Therapeutic Efficacy Between Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparotomy for Acute Obstructive Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Zhengrong Li, Daojiang Li, Zhigang Jie, Guoyang Zhang, Yi Liu
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2015; 25(7): 548.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center
    TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, WATARU NOGUCHI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SHUUJI UDA, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2015; 3(3): 533.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study
    JiaQing Gong, YongKuan Cao, YunMing Li, GuoHu Zhang, PeiHong Wang, GuoDe Luo
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(10): 2998.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution
    TAKAYUKI TAJIMA, MASAYA MUKAI, MASASHI YAMAZAKI, SHIGEO HIGAMI, SOUICHIROU YAMAMOTO, SAYURI HASEGAWA, EIJI NOMURA, SOTARO SADAHIRO, SEIEI YASUDA, HIROYASU MAKUUCHI
    Oncology Letters.2014; 8(2): 627.     CrossRef
  • Should Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Be Placed in the Realm of Minimally Invasive Surgery?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(2): 42.     CrossRef
Feasibility of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery as Compared to Open Surgery for Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Case-Controlled Study
Sang Eun Nam, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Jin Hee Paik, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):17-21.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.17
  • 4,039 View
  • 17 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes by comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open surgery for sigmoid colon cancer.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection (HAL-AR group) and 52 patients who underwent a conventional open anterior resection during the same period were enrolled (open group) in this study with a case-controlled design.

Results

Pathologic parameters were similar between the two groups. The incidences of immediate postoperative leukocytosis were 38.5% in the HAL-AR group and 69.2% in the open group (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the two groups as to leukocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrits (P = 0.758, P = 0.383, and P = 0.285, respectively). Of the postoperative recovery indicators, first flatus, sips of water and soft diet started on postoperative days 3, 5, 7 in the HALS group and on days 4, 5, 6 in the open group showed statistical significance (P = 0.021, P = 0.259, and P = 0.174, respectively). Administration of additional pain killers was needed for 1.2 days in the HAL-AR group and 2.4 days in the open group (P = 0.002). No significant differences in the durations of hospital stay and the rates of postoperative complications were noted, and no postoperative mortality was encountered in either group.

Conclusion

The patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent a HAL-AR had a lower incidence of postoperative leukocytosis, less administration of pain killers, and faster first flatus than those who underwent open surgery. Clinical outcomes for patients' recovery and pathology status were similar between the two groups. Therefore, a HAL-AR for sigmoid colon cancer is feasible and has the same benefit as minimally invasive surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer
    Xubing Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Chaoyang Gu, Tao Hu, Liang Bi, Ziqiang Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(33): e7794.     CrossRef
  • Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Versatile Tool for Colorectal Surgeons
    Ju Yong Cheong, Christopher J. Young
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(4): 125.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs open colectomy: an assessment from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted cohort
    Cigdem Benlice, Meagan Costedio, Luca Stocchi, Maher A. Abbas, Emre Gorgun
    The American Journal of Surgery.2016; 212(5): 808.     CrossRef
  • Learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy
    Jia-Qing Gong
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(5): 1606.     CrossRef
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study
    JiaQing Gong, YongKuan Cao, YunMing Li, GuoHu Zhang, PeiHong Wang, GuoDe Luo
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(10): 2998.     CrossRef
Incidence and Multiplicities of Adenomatous Polyps in TNM Stage I Colorectal Cancer in Korea
Young-Sang Hong, Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Gang-Mi Kim, Su-Ran Kim, Sung-Noh Hong, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):213-218.   Published online August 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.213
  • 3,554 View
  • 39 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

In recent years, the incidence of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) has markedly increased in the population within the Republic of Korea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC patients and in the general population.

Methods

Between March 2003 and September 2009, 168 patients with stage I CRC were enrolled in this study. In addition, the records of 4,315 members of the general population without CRC, as determined by colonoscopy during a health check-up, were reviewed.

Results

Of the 168 patients with stage I CRC, 68 (40.5%) had coexisting colorectal adenomatous polyps and of the 4,315 members of the general population, 1,112 (26.0%) had coexisting adenomatous polyps (P = 0.006). The prevalences of adenomatous polyp multiplicity in early CRC and in the general population were 32% and 15%, respectively (P = 0.023). Patients with coexisting adenomatous polyps had a higher frequency of tubulovillous or villous adenomas than members of the general population with polyps (7.5% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.037). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed that the occurrence (44% vs. 34%, P = 0.006) and the multiplicity (32% vs. 15%, P = 0.023) of adenomatous polyps were greater for T2 than T1 cancer.

Conclusion

The prevalence and the multiplicity of adenomatous polyps in TNM stage I CRC is higher than it is in the general population. The findings of this study suggest that depth of invasion of early stage CRC affects the prevalence and the number of adenomatous polyps in the remaining colon and rectum.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
    Jin-Hee Paik, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(5): 281.     CrossRef
Oxaliplatin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: Two Case Reports
Chun-Geun Ryu, Eun-Joo Jung, Gangmi Kim, Su Ran Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):266-269.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.266
  • 3,532 View
  • 28 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Oxaliplatin with infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX regimen) is the one of the standard chemotherapy regimens for treating a colorectal carcinoma. The most common side effects include neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting and peripheral neuropathy, and these are moderate and manageable. However, pulmonary toxicity is rarely reported to be associated with the FOLFOX regimen. Moreover, there is no established guideline for the management of this side effect. Here, along with a literature review, we report two cases of rapidly developing pulmonary fibrosis related to the use of the FOLFOX regimen in patients with colorectal carcinomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The intervention of B. longum metabolites in Fnevs' carcinogenic capacity: A potential double-edged sword
    Jingyu Xu, Xinyu Wu, Luyi Yang, Xiaoxi Xu
    Experimental Cell Research.2025; : 114407.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Rare but Fatal Reality
    Kinnera Sahithi Urlapu, Dmitry Lvovsky
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary Fibrosis Secondary to Oxaliplatin Treatment: From Rarity to Reality: A Case Study and Literature Review
    Ana C. Moreira, João Portela, Carlos Couto, José Duarte, Natália Martins, Jorge Soares
    Oncology and Therapy.2020; 8(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • A case report of acute pulmonary hypertension after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and review of the literature
    Thomas S. Zajonz, Michael Sander, Winfried Padberg, Andreas Hecker, Ruediger Hörbelt, Christian Koch, Emmanuel Schneck
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2018; 27: 26.     CrossRef
  • Prognosis and treatment of FOLFOX therapy related interstitial pneumonia: a plea for multimodal immune modulating therapy in the respiratory insufficient patient
    Annick De Weerdt, Amélie Dendooven, Annemie Snoeckx, Jan Pen, Martin Lammens, Philippe G. Jorens
    BMC Cancer.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature
    Mor Moskovitz, Mira Wollner, Nissim Haim
    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2015; 2015: 1.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary Fibrosis Secondary to FOLFOX Chemotherapy: A Case Report
    Wai Cheong Soon, Kate West, David Gibeon, Elizabeth Frances Bowen
    Case Reports in Oncology.2014; 7(3): 662.     CrossRef
  • Granulomatous Lung Disease Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Induced by a Single Application of Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report
    Dane Wildner, Frank Boxberger, Axel Wein, Kerstin Wolff, Heinz Albrecht, Gudrun Männlein, Rolf Janka, Kerstin Amann, Jürgen Siebler, Werner Hohenberger, Markus F. Neurath, Richard Strauß
    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2013; 2013: 1.     CrossRef
Impaction of a Foreign Body in the Rectum by Improper Use of a (Electronic) Massager: A Case Report
Eun-Joo Jung, Chun-Geun Ryu, Gangmi Kim, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):298-301.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.298
  • 3,712 View
  • 53 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A male, 67 years old, visited the emergency room because of a foreign body impacted in his rectum. While he was being treated for grade-II hemorrhoids conservatively, he heard that massage of the peri-anal area could be helpful for preventing hemorrhoids. Thus, while using an electronic massager after placing the head of the machine into a short round bar, the head became separated from the machine, and this was inserted into the anus and impacted. The patient had anal discomfort without abdominal pain. His vital signs were stable, and no abnormal physical findings were found for the abdomen. On digital rectal examination, the rim of the foreign body was palpated about 8 cm from the anal verge. Anal bleeding, abnormal discharge, or foul odor was not found. On a simple abdominal X-ray, a radio-opaque foreign body was observed in the pelvic cavity, and mild leukocytosis was noted on the laboratory test. To avoid injury to the anal sphincter, we tried to remove the foreign body under the spinal anesthesia. After anesthesia had been administered, the foreign body was palpated more distally at 5-6 cm from the anal verge by digital examination, and the foreign body was found to have a hole in its center. This was held using a Kelly clamp, and with digital guiding, was removed through the anus. After removal, an anoscopic examination was performed to determine if mucosal injury had occurred in the rectum or anal canal. The patient was discharged without complication after 24 hours of close observation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rectal perforation caused by a sharp pig backbone in a middle-aged patient with mild depression
    Hyeong Ju Sun, Jeonghun Lee, Dong Min Kim, Myeong-Su Chu, Kyoung Sun Park, Dong Jin Choi
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2015; 32(1): 31.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP