Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Corrado Pedrazzani 1 Article
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Surgical technique
Comparison of Short-term Results after Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Standard Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of a Western Center Cohort
Cristian Conti, Corrado Pedrazzani, Giulia Turri, Eduardo Fernandes, Enrico Lazzarini, Raffaele De Luca, Alessandro Valdegamberi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alfredo Guglielmi
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(3):166-173.   Published online April 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.18
  • 4,946 View
  • 160 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) right colectomy is a technically demanding procedure infrequently employed in Western centers. This retrospective cohort study aims to analyze the safety of laparoscopic CME colectomy compared to standard colectomy for right-sided colon cancer in a Western series.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic CME right colectomy were compared to the ones of 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic standard right colectomy.
Results
No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the CME and standard right colectomy groups. No differences were demonstrated in terms of blood loss (P = 0.060), intraoperative complications (P = 1), conversion rate (P = 0.102), and operative time (P = 0.473). No deaths were observed in either group, while complication rate was 40.0% in the CME and 49.1% in the standard group (P = 0.353). Severe complications occurred in 10.0% vs. 9.1% (P = 0.842), redo surgery in 5.0% vs. 7.3% (P = 0.708), and unplanned readmission in 5.0% vs. 5.5% (P = 1) after CME and standard colectomy, respectively. A significant difference in favor of CME was observed in the total length of specimen (P < 0.001), proximal (P = 0.018), and distal margins (P = 0.037). The number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly higher in the CME group (27 vs. 22, P = 0.037).
Conclusion
In Western series, where patients have less favorable clinical characteristics, laparoscopic CME allows to obtain better quality surgical specimens and comparable short-term outcomes compared to standard right colectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Retrocaecal, supracolic and medial dissection (the RESUME approach) as an optimal surgical procedure for right‐sided colon cancer—A Video Vignette
    Hong‐min Ahn, Min Hyeong Jo, Mi Jeong Choi, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Complete mesocolic excision (CME) impacts survival only for Stage III right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kengo Hayashi, Roberto Passera, Chiara Meroni, Rebecca Dallorto, Chiara Marafante, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Alberto Arezzo
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2024; 33(6): 323.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pedja Cuk, Mohamad Jawhara, Issam Al-Najami, Per Helligsø, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Influence of colonic mesenteric area on the number of lymph node retrieval for colon cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Nadir Adnan Hacım, Ahmet Akbaş, Yigit Ulgen, Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan, Serhat Meric, Merve Tokocin, Onder Karabay, Yuksel Altinel
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Uptake of robot-assisted colon cancer surgery in the Netherlands
    Marlou F. M. Sterk, Rogier M. P. H. Crolla, Mareille Verseveld, Jan Willem T. Dekker, George P. van der Schelling, Cornelis Verhoef, Pim B. Olthof
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(11): 8196.     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP