Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles
Search
Bandipalyam V Praveen 1 Article
Safety and Efficacy of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
Yahya A Al-Abed, Jennifer Ayers, Abraham Ayantunde, Bandipalyam V Praveen
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):73-78.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.73
  • 4,773 View
  • 41 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Permacol has been gaining popularity in recent times for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI). This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anal submucosal Permacol injection in the treatment of FI.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent Permacol injection for FI over a 3-year period were included. Patients' data relating to obstetric history, anorectal/pelvic operations, type of FI, preoperative anorectal physiology results and follow-up details for outcome measures were collected. Preoperative and postoperative Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Scores (CCFISs) were noted. Patients were surveyed by using a telephone questionnaire to assess the quality of life and other outcome measures. Data were analysed using SPSS ver.19.0.

Results

Thirty patients (28 females and 2 males) with a median age of 67 years were included in the study. Of those patients, 37%, 50%, and 13% were noted to have passive, mixed and urge FI, respectively. Six of the patients (20%) had repeat Permacol injections, 5 of whom had sustained responses to the first Permacol injection for a mean of 11 months. There was a significant improvement in the CCFIS from a baseline median of 12.5, mean 12.8 interquartile range [IQR], 6–20), to a median of 3.5, mean 4.8 (IQR, 0–20), P < 0.001. Of the patients surveyed by telephone 89% were satisfied with their overall experience and the improvement in their symptoms following Permacol injections.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated that Permacol injection for the treatment of FI is safe and effective and has no associated major complications. However, the results are not permanent; consequently, a significant proportion of the patients with an initial response may require repeat injections.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness of Autologous Fat Graft in Treating Fecal Incontinence
    Hyeonseok Jeong, Sung Hwan Hwang, Hyoung Rae Kim, Kil O Ryu, Jiyong Lim, Hye Mi Yu, Jihoon Yoon, Chee Young Kim, Kwang-Yong Jeong, Young Jae Jung, In Seob Jeong, Young Gil Choi
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 144.     CrossRef
  • Functional Outcome of Human Adipose Stem Cell Injections in Rat Anal Sphincter Acute Injury Model
    Kirsi Kuismanen, Miia Juntunen, Nathaniel Narra Girish, Heikki Tuominen, Heini Huhtala, Kari Nieminen, Jari Hyttinen, Susanna Miettinen
    Stem Cells Translational Medicine.2018; 7(3): 295.     CrossRef
  • Sacral neuromodulation compared with injection of bulking agents for faecal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury – a randomized controlled trial
    M. Rydningen, T. Dehli, T. Wilsgaard, A. Rydning, M. Kumle, R. O. Lindsetmo, S. Norderval
    Colorectal Disease.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Fecal Incontinence
    Doo Han Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 49.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP